Colorado Revised Statutes
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-50-128 (2026)
Certification required before salary paid
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) No salary shall be paid to any officer or employee of the state within the state personnel system as provided by the constitution unless the state personnel director has certified that the employment is in accordance with this part 1. (2) and (3) Repealed.
Source: L. 72: R&RE, p. 174, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 26-1-28. L. 79: (3) added, p. 947, § 2, effective July 1. L. 93: (2) and (3) repealed, p. 286, § 2, effective April 7.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1986–2010 · leading case: Colorado Ass'n of Pub. Employees v. Dep't of Highways, 809 P.2d 988 (Colo. 1991).
Colorado Ass'n of Pub. Employees v. Dep't of Highways, 809 P.2d 988 (Colo. 1991). “Certain affected state employees (employees), the Colorado Association of Public Employees and the president of its board of directors (collectively, CAPE) sought a determination that contracts with private sector vendors for such services would violate section 24-50-128,10B…”
Tising v. State Pers. Bd. of State of Colorado, 825 P.2d 1011 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991). “1991), in which the court addressed the validity of personal service contracts under § 24-50-128, C.R.S. (1988 Repl.Vol. 10B).”
Welch v. Indus. Com'n of State of Colo., 722 P.2d 439 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986). “See § 24-50-128, C.R.S. (1982 Repl.Vol. 10). IJow-ever, § 24-50-128(3), C.”
Univ. of S. Colorado v. State Pers. Bd., 759 P.2d 865 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988). “On appeal, the Board vacated that decision and remanded the matter to the hearing officer for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether USC had complied with § 24-50-128, C.R.S. (1982 Repl. Vol. 10) in abolishing the positions which claimants held.”
Neoplan USA Corp. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 778 P.2d 312 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989). “” Here, although Goold’s contract with the Division of Labor did not require nor was it completed within a six-month period, it did provide that his services were to be compensated at an hourly rate and were not to exceed forty hours.”
Taylor v. State Pers. Bd., 228 P.3d 273 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010). “2, § 24-50-128(8), 1979 Colo. Sess. Laws 947 -48 (declaring then existing state policy against personal service contracts that ereated an employer-employee relationship where the duties of such positions were classified and where such duties were commonly or historically…”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-50-128(2): 1 case
Colorado Ass'n of Pub. Employees v. Dep't of Highways, 809 P.2d 988 (Colo. 1991). “Certain affected state employees (employees), the Colorado Association of Public Employees and the president of its board of directors (collectively, CAPE) sought a determination that contracts with private sector vendors for such services would violate section 24-50-128,10B…”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-50-128(3): 4 cases
Colorado Ass'n of Pub. Employees v. Dep't of Highways, 809 P.2d 988 (Colo. 1991). “Certain affected state employees (employees), the Colorado Association of Public Employees and the president of its board of directors (collectively, CAPE) sought a determination that contracts with private sector vendors for such services would violate section 24-50-128,10B…”
Tising v. State Pers. Bd. of State of Colorado, 825 P.2d 1011 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991). “1991), in which the court addressed the validity of personal service contracts under § 24-50-128, C.R.S. (1988 Repl.Vol. 10B).”
Welch v. Indus. Com'n of State of Colo., 722 P.2d 439 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986). “See § 24-50-128, C.R.S. (1982 Repl.Vol. 10). IJow-ever, § 24-50-128(3), C.”
Univ. of S. Colorado v. State Pers. Bd., 759 P.2d 865 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988). “On appeal, the Board vacated that decision and remanded the matter to the hearing officer for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether USC had complied with § 24-50-128, C.R.S. (1982 Repl. Vol. 10) in abolishing the positions which claimants held.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 24-50-128(8): 1 case
Taylor v. State Pers. Bd., 228 P.3d 273 (Colo. Ct. App. 2010). “2, § 24-50-128(8), 1979 Colo. Sess. Laws 947 -48 (declaring then existing state policy against personal service contracts that ereated an employer-employee relationship where the duties of such positions were classified and where such duties were commonly or historically…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.