Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 25
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 25-8-602 (2026)

Notice of alleged violations

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Whenever the division has reason to believe that a violation of an order, permit, or control regulation issued or promulgated under authority of this article has occurred, the division shall cause written notice to be served personally or by certified mail, return receipt requested, upon the alleged violator or his agent for service of process. The notice shall state the provision alleged to be violated and the facts alleged to constitute a violation, and it may include the nature of any corrective action proposed to be required.

(2) Each cease-and-desist and clean-up order issued pursuant to sections 25-8-605 and 25-8-606 shall be accompanied by or have incorporated in it the notice provided for in subsection (1) of this section unless such notice has been given prior to issuance of such cease- and-desist or clean-up order.

Source: L. 81: Entire article R&RE, p. 1333, § 1, effective July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1986–1994 · leading case: Sierra Club v. Colorado Refining Co., 852 F. Supp. 1476 (D. Colo. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sierra Club v. Colorado Refining Co., 852 F. Supp. 1476 (D. Colo. 1994). · cites it 2× “Colo.Rev.Stat. § 25-8-602 (1989). CDH served the Notice of Significant Noncompliance on CRC in compliance with the above procedures for the institution of enforcement proceedings under the CWQCA.”
L.G. Everist, Inc. v. Water Quality Control Comm'n, 714 P.2d 1349 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “Pursuant to § 25-8-602, C.R.S. (1982 Repl.Vol. 11), an alleged violator must answer each alleged violation.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 25-8-602(1): 1 case
L.G. Everist, Inc. v. Water Quality Control Comm'n, 714 P.2d 1349 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986). “Pursuant to § 25-8-602, C.R.S. (1982 Repl.Vol. 11), an alleged violator must answer each alleged violation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.