Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 27
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 27-10.5-112 (2026)

Individuals' rights - repeal

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(Repealed) Source: L. 75: Entire article added, p. 912, § 1, effective July 1. L. 85: Entire section R&RE, p. 1000, § 14, effective July 1. L. 92: Entire section amended, p. 1374, § 13, effective July 1. L. 2013: (5) added by revision, (HB 13-1314), ch. 323, pp. 1799, 1813, §§ 13, 56.

Editor's note: (1) This section was relocated to § 25.5-10-218 in 2014.

(2) Subsection (5) provided for the repeal of this section, effective March 1, 2014. (See L. 2013, pp. 1799, 1813.)

27-10.5-113. Right to individualized plan or individualized family service plan - repeal. (Repealed) Source: L. 75: Entire article added, p. 913, § 1, effective July 1. L. 85: (1) and (2) amended and (3) repealed, pp. 1001, 1016, §§ 15, 46, effective July 1. L. 92: Entire section R&RE, p. 1375, § 14, effective July 1. L. 2007: Entire section amended, p. 1565, § 9, effective May 31. L. 2008: Entire section amended, p. 1455, § 8, effective August 5. L. 2010: (2) amended, (HB 10-1213), ch. 220, p. 962, § 5, effective May 10. L. 2013: (3) added by revision, (HB 13-1314), ch. 323, pp. 1799, 1813, §§ 13, 56.

Editor's note: (1) This section was relocated to § 25.5-10-219 in 2014.

(2) Subsection (3) provided for the repeal of this section, effective March 1, 2014. (See L. 2013, pp. 1799, 1813.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2006–2006 · leading case: Tesmer v. Colorado High Sch. Activities Ass'n., 140 P.3d 249 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Tesmer v. Colorado High Sch. Activities Ass'n., 140 P.3d 249 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 6× “Orth, together with his mother, then filed a complaint in district court, alleging that the application of the eight semester rule to him *252 violated the statutory protections of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA) regarding the developmentally disabled set forth in §…”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 27-10.5-112(1): 1 case
Tesmer v. Colorado High Sch. Activities Ass'n., 140 P.3d 249 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006). “Orth, together with his mother, then filed a complaint in district court, alleging that the application of the eight semester rule to him *252 violated the statutory protections of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA) regarding the developmentally disabled set forth in §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.