Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 30-20-107 (2026)

Designation of exclusive sites and facilities

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The governing body of any county or municipality may by ordinance designate and approve one or more solid wastes disposal sites and facilities, either within or without its corporate limits, if designated and approved by the governing body having jurisdiction, as its exclusive solid wastes disposal site and facility or sites and facilities, and thereafter each such site and facility shall be used by such county or municipality for the disposal of its solid wastes; but, prior to any such designation and approval, such governing body shall hold a public hearing to review the disposal method to be used and the fees to be charged, if any. Source: L. 67: p. 760, § 7. C.R.S. 1963: § 36-23-7. L. 71: p. 343, § 8. L. 91: Entire section amended, p. 967, § 8, effective June 5.

30-20-107.5. Operation of landfill gas facilities within solid wastes disposal sites and facilities. The governing body of any municipality or county shall have the authority to make such provisions as may be necessary for the operation of landfill gas facilities within any solid wastes disposal site or facility under its jurisdiction to enable the municipality or county to exercise its powers relating to landfill gas operations under sections 30-11-307 and 31-15-716, C.R.S.

Source: L. 80: Entire section added, p. 653, § 4, effective July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1994–2011 · leading case: C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown, 511 U.S. 383 (1994).
C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown, 511 U.S. 383 (1994). · cites it 2× “[*] Colo. Rev. Stat. § 30-20-107 (Supp. 1993); Conn.”
Dill v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of Lincoln Cnty., 928 P.2d 809 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 6× “Resolution 294 provides that: [Pjursuant to CRS 30-20-107, the Lincoln County Solid Waste Landfill Site .”
Bank of New York v. Yugoimport SDPR J.P., 780 F. Supp. 2d 344 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). “§ 49-765 (Lexis 2010) (Arizona) (same); Colo. Rev.Stat. § 30-20-107 (West 2010) (Colorado) (same); Fla.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.