Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 31
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 31-10-1303 (2026)

Filing statement - contents

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The contestor shall file in the office of the clerk of the district court, within ten days after the expiration of the period within which a recount may be requested pursuant to section 31-10-1207 (2), or within ten days after the conclusion of a recount conducted pursuant to section 31-10-1207, whichever is later, a written statement of the contestor's intention to contest the election, setting forth the name of the contestor, that the contestor is a registered elector of the municipality, the name of the contestee, the office contested, the time of election, and the particular causes of the contest. The statement shall be verified by the affidavit of the contestor or some registered elector of the municipality that the causes set forth in such statement are true to the best of the affiant's knowledge and belief.

Source: L. 75: Entire title R&RE, p. 1067, § 1, effective July 1. L. 87: Entire section amended, p. 332, § 95, effective July 1. L. 2000: Entire section amended, p. 799, § 20, effective August 2.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 31-10-1103 as it existed prior to 1975.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1993–2004 · leading case: Harrison v. Pinnacol Assurance, 107 P.3d 969 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Harrison v. Pinnacol Assurance, 107 P.3d 969 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “35, § 31-10-1303 at 332). We discern no statute of limitations specifically applicable to declaratory judgment actions and therefore apply the two-year catchall statute of limitations.”
Mahaffey v. Barnhill, 855 P.2d 847 (Colo. 1993). · cites it 2× “Thus, the twenty-day time limitation expired on Sunday, December 13,1992, which was extended to Monday, December 14, 1992, under section 31-10-1303, 12B C.R.S. (1986). The first stage of the trial was held on December 17, 1992, twenty-five days after the matter was at issue.”
Molleck v. City of Golden, 884 P.2d 725 (Colo. 1994). · cites it 2× “§ 31-10-1303, 12B C.R.S. (1994 Supp.). On October 1, 1993, Molleck filed a notice of appeal with the court of appeals, which subsequently transferred the matter to this court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.