Except as expressly provided in this article,
provisions of this article may not be varied by agreement, and rights conferred by this article
may not be waived. A declarant may not act under a power of attorney or use any other device to
evade the limitations or prohibitions of this article or the declaration.
Source: L. 91: Entire article added, p. 1707, § 1, effective July 1, 1992.
Notes of Decisions
Pulte Home Corp. v. Countryside Cmty. Ass'n, Inc, 2016 CO 64 (Colo. 2016).
· cites it 4× “Because article XII, section 4 of the CCR and section 38-33.3-104 of CCIOA provide that the statute prevails in the event of any conflict between the two sources, we then consider whether the CCR’s formation framework comports with CCIOA.”
Ryan Ranch Cmty. Ass'n, Inc. v. Kelley, 2016 CO 65 (Colo. 2016).
· cites it 4× “See § 38-33.3-104 (“Except as expressly provided in this article, provisions of this article may not be varied by agreement, and rights conferred by this article may not be waived.”
Silverview at Overlook, LLC v. Overlook at Mt. Crested Butte Ltd. Liab. Co., 97 P.3d 252 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 2× “3-205 are underscored by § 38-33.3-104, C.R.S.2003, which prohibits variation by agreement: “Except as expressly provided in this article, provisions of this article may not be varied by agreement, and rights conferred by this article may not be waived.”
v. Brooks Towers Residences, 2021 COA 87 (Colo. Ct. App. 2021).
· cites it 4× “” § 38-33.3-104, C.R.S. 2020. 17 ¶ 44 Our decision is in line with recent supreme court cases strictly enforcing other procedural requirements set forth in CCIOA.”
Ryan Ranch Cmty. Ass'n v. Kelley, 409 P.3d 375 (Colo. Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 5× “¶ 32 CCIOA was enacted by the General Assembly in order to establish “a clear, comprehensive, and uniform framework for the creation and operation of common interest communities;” § 38-33.”
Manor Vail Condo. Ass'n v. Bd. of Equalization, 956 P.2d 654 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 2× “Given this conclusion, we also need not consider the defendants’ argument that enforcement of the stipulation would contravene the uniformity clause of the state constitution and violate public policy by requiring them to ignore non-residential common elements and to apply a…”
2800 v. Residences (Colo. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 2× “See § 38-33.3-104, C.R.S. 2025 (“Except as expressly provided in this article, provisions of this article may not be varied by agreement, and rights conferred by this article may not be waived.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.