Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 4
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 4-1-106 (2026)

Use of singular and plural - gender

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In this title, unless the statutory context otherwise requires:

(1) Words in the singular number include the plural, and those in the plural include the singular; and

(2) Words of any gender also refer to any other gender.

Source: L. 2006: Entire article R&RE, p. 458, § 1, effective September 1.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 4-1-102 (5) as it existed prior to 2006.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1981–2006 · leading case: Proactive Tech., Inc. v. Denver Place Assocs. Ltd. P'ship, 141 P.3d 959 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Proactive Tech., Inc. v. Denver Place Assocs. Ltd. P'ship, 141 P.3d 959 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 8× “However, § 4-1-106(1), C.R.S.2005, states, in relevant part: The remedies provided by this title shall be liberally administered to the end that the aggrieved party may be put in as good a position as if the other party had fully performed, but neither consequential or special…”
Great West Food Packers, Inc. v. Longmont Foods Co., 636 P.2d 1331 (Colo. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 3× “Colorado courts have recognized two rules of damages which are controlling in this case. First, although damages may not be calculable with mathematical exactitude, so long as the plaintiff introduces some evidence which is sufficient to allow a reasonable estimate of damages,…”
Cooley v. Big Horn Harvestore Sys., Inc., 813 P.2d 736 (Colo. 1991). “§ 4-1-106, 2 C.R.S. (1973). In view of these guidelines, we find persuasive those authorities which suggest that the two subsections in question must be construed together to effectuate their purposes.”
Jelen & Son, Inc. v. Bandimere, 801 P.2d 1182 (Colo. 1990). · cites it 2× “Section 4-1-106(1) declares: The remedies provided by this title shall be liberally administered to the end that the aggrieved party may be put in as good a position as if the other party had fully performed, but neither consequential or special nor penal damages may be had…”
Gibbons v. Windish, Inc., 662 P.2d 500 (Colo. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “The Uniform Commercial Code must be interpreted in accordance with § 4-1-106(1), C.R.S.1973, which states, in part: “The remedies provided by this title shall be liberally administered to the end that the aggrieved party may be put in as good a position as if the other party had…”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 4-1-106(1): 3 cases
Proactive Tech., Inc. v. Denver Place Assocs. Ltd. P'ship, 141 P.3d 959 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006). “However, § 4-1-106(1), C.R.S.2005, states, in relevant part: The remedies provided by this title shall be liberally administered to the end that the aggrieved party may be put in as good a position as if the other party had fully performed, but neither consequential or special…”
Jelen & Son, Inc. v. Bandimere, 801 P.2d 1182 (Colo. 1990). “Section 4-1-106(1) declares: The remedies provided by this title shall be liberally administered to the end that the aggrieved party may be put in as good a position as if the other party had fully performed, but neither consequential or special nor penal damages may be had…”
Gibbons v. Windish, Inc., 662 P.2d 500 (Colo. Ct. App. 1983). “The Uniform Commercial Code must be interpreted in accordance with § 4-1-106(1), C.R.S.1973, which states, in part: “The remedies provided by this title shall be liberally administered to the end that the aggrieved party may be put in as good a position as if the other party had…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.