Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 40
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-15-103 (2026)

Application of part

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The provisions of this part 1 shall apply throughout this article, unless specifically otherwise stated.

Source: L. 87: Entire article R&RE, p. 1479, § 1, effective July 2.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–1990 · leading case: GTE Sprint Commc'ns Corp. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 753 P.2d 212 (Colo. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
GTE Sprint Commc'ns Corp. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 753 P.2d 212 (Colo. 1988). · cites it 4× “In the spring of 1984, Sprint, Western Union, and MCI filed applications for certificates of public convenience and necessity pursuant to section 40-15-103, 17 C.R.S. (1984). They sought to enter the Colorado interLATA telecommunications market then occupied solely by AT & T.”
Colorado Off. of Consum. Couns. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 786 P.2d 1086 (Colo. 1990). · cites it 2× “[4] Relevant sections of the Act provide that intrastate telecommunications services providers are public utilities subject to regulation by the Commission, § 40-15-102, that intrastate providers are required to obtain a certificate *1090 of public convenience and necessity from…”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-15-103(1): 1 case
GTE Sprint Commc'ns Corp. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 753 P.2d 212 (Colo. 1988). “In the spring of 1984, Sprint, Western Union, and MCI filed applications for certificates of public convenience and necessity pursuant to section 40-15-103, 17 C.R.S. (1984). They sought to enter the Colorado interLATA telecommunications market then occupied solely by AT & T.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-15-103(3): 1 case
GTE Sprint Commc'ns Corp. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 753 P.2d 212 (Colo. 1988). “In the spring of 1984, Sprint, Western Union, and MCI filed applications for certificates of public convenience and necessity pursuant to section 40-15-103, 17 C.R.S. (1984). They sought to enter the Colorado interLATA telecommunications market then occupied solely by AT & T.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.