Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 40
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-6-112 (2026)

Alteration or amendment of decision - decisions final in collateral actions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The commission, at any time upon notice to the public utility affected, and after opportunity to be heard as provided in the case of complaints, may rescind, alter, or amend any decision made by it. Any decision rescinding, altering, or amending a prior decision, when served upon the public utility affected, shall have the same effect as original decisions.

(2) In all collateral actions or proceedings, the decisions of the commission which have become final shall be conclusive.

Source: L. 13: p. 496, § 49. C.L. § 2958. CSA: C. 137, § 49. CRS 53: § 115-6-12. C.R.S. 1963: § 115-6-12. L. 69: p. 947, § 44.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1980–2012 · leading case: Lake Durango Water Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 67 P.3d 12 (Colo. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lake Durango Water Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 67 P.3d 12 (Colo. 2003). “§ 40-6-112(2), 11 CRS. (2002). However, the PUC may rescind, alter, or amend any decision after proper notice and opportunity to be heard.”
Rocky Mountain Nat. Gas Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 617 P.2d 1175 (Colo. 1980). · cites it 3× “2 Under section 40-6-112(1), C.R.S. 1973, the PUC may remove prior restrictions under its statutory authority to amend a certificate when it is in the interest of public convenience and necessity to do so.”
Glustrom v. Colorado Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 280 P.3d 662 (Colo. 2012). · cites it 3× “T6 On July 16, 2008, the PUC denied Xeel's motion to dismiss, finding that, under section 40-6-112(1), C.R.S. (2011), the PUC possessed the authority to reconsider its pri- *665 or CPCN decision 4 Even though it possessed the authority to reconsider Comanche 3's CPCN, however,…”
City of Boulder v. Colorado Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 996 P.2d 1270 (Colo. 2000). “Application of the PUC’s Integrated Resource Planning Regulations Boulder’s final argument focuses on regulations that the PUC established to guide expansion of utility services.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-6-112(1): 2 cases
Rocky Mountain Nat. Gas Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 617 P.2d 1175 (Colo. 1980). “2 Under section 40-6-112(1), C.R.S. 1973, the PUC may remove prior restrictions under its statutory authority to amend a certificate when it is in the interest of public convenience and necessity to do so.”
Glustrom v. Colorado Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 280 P.3d 662 (Colo. 2012). “T6 On July 16, 2008, the PUC denied Xeel's motion to dismiss, finding that, under section 40-6-112(1), C.R.S. (2011), the PUC possessed the authority to reconsider its pri- *665 or CPCN decision 4 Even though it possessed the authority to reconsider Comanche 3's CPCN, however,…”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-6-112(2): 1 case
Lake Durango Water Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 67 P.3d 12 (Colo. 2003). “§ 40-6-112(2), 11 CRS. (2002). However, the PUC may rescind, alter, or amend any decision after proper notice and opportunity to be heard.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.