Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 42
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 42-2-208 (2026)

Computation of number of convictions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

With respect to persons charged as habitual offenders, in computing the number of convictions, all convictions must result from offenses occurring on or after July 1, 1973.

Source: L. 94: Entire title amended with relocations, p. 2160, § 1, effective January 1, 1995.

PART 3

IDENTIFICATION CARDS

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1979–2000 · leading case: Quintana v. City of Westminster, 8 P.3d 527 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Quintana v. City of Westminster, 8 P.3d 527 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000). “Here, as noted, the trial court erred by not making a finding as to whether the officer endangered life or property pursuant to § 42-2-208(2)(c). - Therefore, the expert's *531 opinion that the officer was reckless was not relevant to the issue to be decided to determine…”
Van Gerpen v. Peterson, 620 P.2d 714 (Colo. 1980). · cites it 3× “Moreover, section 42-2-208, C.R.S. 1973, of the Habitual Traffic Offender Act expressly provides that its revocation sanction applies to all offenses occurring on or after July 1, 1973.”
Cagle v. Charnes, 604 P.2d 697 (Colo. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2× “See § 42-2-208, C.R.S.1973. Nor was plaintiff denied due process by virtue of the trial court failing to advise him of the possible consequences of his pleas under the Habitual Offender Act.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 42-2-208(2)(c): 1 case
Quintana v. City of Westminster, 8 P.3d 527 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000). “Here, as noted, the trial court erred by not making a finding as to whether the officer endangered life or property pursuant to § 42-2-208(2)(c). - Therefore, the expert's *531 opinion that the officer was reckless was not relevant to the issue to be decided to determine…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.