Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 42
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 42-6-108 (2026)

Identification number - title - street rod vehicles

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(Repealed)

Source: L. 94: Entire title amended with relocations, p. 2452, § 1, effective January 1, 1995. L. 2000: Entire section amended, p. 1648, § 40, effective June 1. L. 2005: Entire section amended, p. 811, § 6, effective August 8. L. 2011: Entire section repealed, (SB 11-031), ch. 86, p. 249, § 22, effective August 10.

Editor's note: This section was relocated to § 42-12-203 in 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1976–2011 · leading case: Colorado Auto & Truck Wreckers Ass'n v. Dep't of Revenue, 618 P.2d 646 (Colo. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Colorado Auto & Truck Wreckers Ass'n v. Dep't of Revenue, 618 P.2d 646 (Colo. 1980). · cites it 3× “); (5) the regulation is an unlawful delegation of authority to insurance companies to determine the criminal liability of an owner; (6) the regulation is invalid because it conflicts with sections 42-6-108 and 109 of the Certificate of Title Act, and, therefore, is outside the…”
Maehal Enter., Inc. v. Thunder Mountain Custom Cycles, Inc., 313 P.3d 584 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011). “2010 (substantially similar provision formerly codified at § 13-6-8 and then at § 42-6-108 until amendment and relocation in 1994).”
People v. Ayala, 770 P.2d 1265 (Colo. 1989). · cites it 4× “Although Colorado requires the seller of a motor vehicle to transfer title to the vehicle at the time of sale, section 42-6-108, 17 C.R.S. (1984), failure to deliver a certificate of title does not prevent the acquisition of ownership rights by the parties to the transaction.”
Webb v. M.F.A. Mut. Ins. Co., 620 P.2d 38 (Colo. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “See § 42-6-108, C.R.S.1973. Consequently, according to M.”
Ranchers & Farmers Livestock Auc. Co. v. Honey, 552 P.2d 313 (Colo. Ct. App. 1976). · cites it 2× “However, the court explicitly recognized the existence of the seller's right to reclaim an automobile, the title to which had passed to the purchaser, upon dishonor of the check tendered in payment. This is consistent with the statement in § 4-2-401, C.”
Hall v. Hong Seung Gee, 725 P.2d 1164 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 3× “” Section 42-6-108, C.R.S. (1984 RepLVol. 17) (the certificate of title act) (emphasis supplied).”
People v. One 1968 Chevrolet 2-Door Vin. 1123378L310864, 895 P.2d 1177 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 4× “The People further assert that the trial court erred in awarding ownership of the vehicle to intervenor because he did not have a cognizable title interest under § 42-6-108, C.R.S. (1993 Repl.Vol. 17). Again, we do not agree.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.