Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 43-1-402 (2026)

Legislative declaration

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) (a) It is declared to be the purpose of the general assembly in the passage of this part 4 to control the existing and future use of advertising devices in areas adjacent to the state highway system in order to protect and promote the health, safety, and welfare of the traveling public and the people of Colorado and such purposes are declared to be of statewide concern. The general assembly finds and declares that the enactment of this part 4 is necessary to further the following substantial state interests:

(I) Protection of the public investment in the state highway system;

(II) Promotion of safety upon the state highway system;

(III) Promotion of the recreational value of public travel;

(IV) Promotion of public pride and spirit both on a statewide and local basis;

(V) Preservation and enhancement of the natural and scenic beauty of this state;

(VI) Broadening the economic well-being and general welfare by attracting to this state tourists and other travelers;

(VII) Providing the traveling public with information as to necessary goods and services in the immediate vicinity of the traveler;

(VIII) Protection and encouragement of local tourist-related businesses for the general economic well-being of this state;

(IX) Insuring that Colorado receives its full share of funds to be apportioned by the congress of the United States for expenditures on federal-aid highways.

(b) In furtherance of the substantial state interests stated in paragraph (a) of this subsection (1), it is the intent of the general assembly that Colorado comply with the federal "Highway Beautification Act of 1965" and rules and regulations adopted thereunder.

(2) The general assembly further finds and declares that this part 4, taken as a whole, represents a balancing of the above-stated substantial state interests.

Source: L. 81: Entire part R&RE, p. 2006, § 1, effective July 1.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 43-1-407 as it existed prior to 1981.

Cross references: For the "Highway Beautification Act of 1965", see Pub.L. 89-285, codified at 23 U.S.C. § 131 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1979–2026 · leading case: Orsinger Outdoor Advert., Inc. v. Dep't of Highways, 752 P.2d 55 (Colo. 1988).
Orsinger Outdoor Advert., Inc. v. Dep't of Highways, 752 P.2d 55 (Colo. 1988). · cites it 5× “§ 43-1-402(1), 17 C.R.S. (1984); see Turner Communications Corporation v.”
Nat'l Advert. Co. v. Dep't of Highways, 718 P.2d 1038 (Colo. 1986). · cites it 3× “) (Old Act); § 43-1-402(1), 17 C.R.S. (1984) (New Act).”
Alpert Corp. v. State Dep't of Highways, 603 P.2d 944 (Colo. 1979). · cites it 2× “(1) No person shall erect or maintain any advertising device as defined in section 43-1-402(1), which is designed, intended, or used to advertise or to give information in the nature of advertising to the public traveling on the main-traveled way of the state highway system, as…”
City of Fort Collins v. Root Outdoor Advert., Inc., 788 P.2d 149 (Colo. 1990). “” § 43-1-402(1)(b), 17 C.R.S. (1984). The Colorado act provides for control of outdoor advertising in accordance with the requirements of the federal act, and just compensation must be paid for the removal of a “lawfully permitted nonconforming advertising device.”
Faustin v. City & Cnty. of Denver, 104 F. Supp. 2d 1280 (D. Colo. 2000). · cites it 2× “The Outdoor Advertising Act was established to "control the existing and future use of advertising devices in areas adjacent to the state highway system in order to protect and promote the health, safety, and welfare of the traveling public and the people of Colora-do_”…”
Faustin v. City & Cty. of Denver, Colorado, 104 F. Supp. 2d 1280 (D. Colo. 2000). · cites it 2× “" Colo.Rev.Stat. § 43-1-402. [3] Although all parties move for summary judgment as to all of Faustin's claims, neither side addresses her right to assemble or free exercise claims in any regard.”
StreetMediaGroup, LLC v. Stockinger (D. Colo. 2021). · cites it 2× “See C.R.S. § 43-1-402. CDOT requires permits for certain types of signs and billboards.”
StreetMediaGroup v. Dept of Transp. (Colo. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “§ 43-1-402(1)(a), C.R.S. 2025; see Orsinger Outdoor Advert.”
StreetMediaGroup v. DOT (Colo. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “” § 43-1-402(1)(a), C.R.S. 2025; see §§ 43-1-401 to -420, C.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 43-1-402(1): 3 cases
Nat'l Advert. Co. v. Dep't of Highways, 718 P.2d 1038 (Colo. 1986). “) (Old Act); § 43-1-402(1), 17 C.R.S. (1984) (New Act).”
Orsinger Outdoor Advert., Inc. v. Dep't of Highways, 752 P.2d 55 (Colo. 1988). “§ 43-1-402(1), 17 C.R.S. (1984); see Turner Communications Corporation v.”
Alpert Corp. v. State Dep't of Highways, 603 P.2d 944 (Colo. 1979). “(1) No person shall erect or maintain any advertising device as defined in section 43-1-402(1), which is designed, intended, or used to advertise or to give information in the nature of advertising to the public traveling on the main-traveled way of the state highway system, as…”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 43-1-402(1)(a): 3 cases
Orsinger Outdoor Advert., Inc. v. Dep't of Highways, 752 P.2d 55 (Colo. 1988). “§ 43-1-402(1), 17 C.R.S. (1984); see Turner Communications Corporation v.”
StreetMediaGroup v. Dept of Transp. (Colo. Ct. App. 2025). “§ 43-1-402(1)(a), C.R.S. 2025; see Orsinger Outdoor Advert.”
StreetMediaGroup v. DOT (Colo. Ct. App. 2026). “” § 43-1-402(1)(a), C.R.S. 2025; see §§ 43-1-401 to -420, C.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 43-1-402(1)(a)(IX): 1 case
Orsinger Outdoor Advert., Inc. v. Dep't of Highways, 752 P.2d 55 (Colo. 1988). “§ 43-1-402(1), 17 C.R.S. (1984); see Turner Communications Corporation v.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 43-1-402(1)(b): 1 case
City of Fort Collins v. Root Outdoor Advert., Inc., 788 P.2d 149 (Colo. 1990). “” § 43-1-402(1)(b), 17 C.R.S. (1984). The Colorado act provides for control of outdoor advertising in accordance with the requirements of the federal act, and just compensation must be paid for the removal of a “lawfully permitted nonconforming advertising device.”
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 43-1-402(l)(b): 1 case
Orsinger Outdoor Advert., Inc. v. Dep't of Highways, 752 P.2d 55 (Colo. 1988). “§ 43-1-402(1), 17 C.R.S. (1984); see Turner Communications Corporation v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.