Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 5-6-108 (2026)

Judicial review

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person aggrieved by any final action or order of the administrator and affected thereby is entitled to a review thereof by the Colorado court of appeals by appropriate proceedings under section 24-4-106 (11), C.R.S. Source: L. 2000: Entire article R&RE, p. 1247, § 1, effective July 1.

Editor's note: This section is similar to former § 5-6-108, as it existed prior to 2000.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1977–2008 · leading case: Rathburn v. Indus. Comm'n, 566 P.2d 372 (Colo. Ct. App. 1977).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Rathburn v. Indus. Comm'n, 566 P.2d 372 (Colo. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 2× “Here, although general in certain respects, the employer's unequivocal testimony as to why petitioner was fired completely and positively supports the Commission's findings that termination was the consequence of poor job performance caused by a poor attitude and lack of…”

State Ex Rel. Suthers v. Cash Advance & Preferred Cash Loans, 205 P.3d 389 (Colo. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “§ 5-6-108, C.R.S.2007. The CCPA regulates deceptive trade practices, which are listed in various sections, including section 6-1-105, C.”

— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 5-6-108(2) — 1 case

Rathburn v. Indus. Comm'n, 566 P.2d 372 (Colo. Ct. App. 1977). “Here, although general in certain respects, the employer's unequivocal testimony as to why petitioner was fired completely and positively supports the Commission's findings that termination was the consequence of poor job performance caused by a poor attitude and lack of…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.