Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 7-126-302 (2026)

Termination, expulsion, or suspension

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Unless otherwise provided by the bylaws, no member of a nonprofit corporation may be expelled or suspended, and no membership or memberships in such nonprofit corporation may be terminated or suspended except pursuant to a procedure that is fair and reasonable and is carried out in good faith.

(2) For purposes of this section, a procedure is fair and reasonable when either:

(a) The bylaws or a written policy of the board of directors state a procedure that provides:

(I) Not less than fifteen days prior written notice of the expulsion, suspension, or termination and the reasons therefor; and

(II) An opportunity for the member to be heard, orally or in writing, not less than five days before the effective date of the expulsion, suspension, or termination by a person or persons authorized to decide that the proposed expulsion, termination, or suspension not take place; or

(b) It is fair and reasonable taking into consideration all of the relevant facts and circumstances.

(3) For purposes of this section, any written notice given by mail must be given by first- class or certified mail sent to the last address of the member shown on the nonprofit corporation's records.

(4) Unless otherwise provided by the bylaws, any proceeding challenging an expulsion, suspension, or termination, including a proceeding in which defective notice is alleged, must be commenced within one year after the effective date of the expulsion, suspension, or termination.

(5) Unless otherwise provided by the bylaws, a member who has been expelled or suspended may be liable to the nonprofit corporation for dues, assessments, or fees as a result of obligations incurred or commitments made prior to expulsion or suspension.

Source: L. 97: Entire article added, p. 672, § 3, effective July 1, 1998. L. 2003: IP(2)(a) amended, p. 2337, § 290, effective July 1, 2004.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Marken v. Knez (Colo. Ct. App. 2025).
Marken v. Knez (Colo. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “See § 7-126-302, C.R.S. 2024. ¶ 27 Thus, because John conveyed his interest in the cabin to the JBS Trust and the JBS Trust did not validly convey its interest to anyone else, the district court correctly concluded that the JBS Trust continues to hold an undivided one-half…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.