Conn. Practice Book § 2-82 (2026)

Sec. 2-82. Admission of Misconduct; Disci- pline by Consent (a) The disciplinary counsel to whom a com- plaint is forwarded after a finding that probable cause exists that the respondent is guilty of mis- conduct may negotiate a proposed disposition of the complaint with the respondent or, if the respondent is represented by an attorney, with the respondent’s attorney. Such a proposed dis- position shall be based upon the respondent’s admission of misconduct, which shall consist of either (1) an admission by the respondent that the material facts alleged in the complaint, or a portion thereof describing one or more acts of misconduct to which the admission relates, are true, or (2) if the respondent denies some or all of such material facts, an acknowledgment by the respondent that there is sufficient evidence to prove such material facts by clear and convincing evidence. (b) If disciplinary counsel and the respondent agree to a proposed disposition of the matter, they shall place their agreement in writing and submit it, together with the complaint, the record in the matter, and the respondent’s underlying admis- sion of misconduct, for approval as follows: (i) by the court, in all matters involving possible suspen- sion or disbarment, or possible imposition of a period of probation or other sanctions beyond the authority of the Statewide Grievance Committee, as set forth in Section 2-37; or (ii) by a reviewing committee of the Statewide Grievance Commit- tee, in all other matters. If, after a hearing, the admission of misconduct is accepted and the pro- posed disposition is approved by the court or the reviewing committee, the matter shall be disposed of in the manner agreed to. If any resulting admis- sion of misconduct or proposed disposition is rejected by the court or the reviewing committee, the admission of misconduct and proposed dispo- sition shall be withdrawn, shall not be made public, and shall not be used against the respondent in any subsequent proceedings. In that event, the matter shall be referred for further proceedings to a different judicial authority or reviewing commit- tee, as appropriate. (c) If disciplinary counsel and the respondent are unable to agree to a proposed disposition of the matter, the respondent may nonetheless tender an admission of misconduct, which shall be in accordance with subsection (a) of this section. If such an admission of misconduct without pro- posed disposition is tendered, disciplinary coun- sel shall cause it to be forwarded, together with the complaint and the record in the matter, for consideration, possible acceptance and disposi- tion as follows: (i) by the court, in all matters involv- ing possible suspension or disbarment, or

© Copyrighted by the Secretary of the State of the State of Connecticut SUPERIOR COURT—GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 2-83 possible imposition of a period of probation or other sanctions beyond the authority of the State- wide Grievance Committee, as set forth in Section 2-37; or (ii) by a reviewing committee of the State- wide Grievance Committee, in all other matters. If, after a hearing, the admission of misconduct is accepted by the court or the reviewing commit- tee, the matter shall be disposed of and any resulting imposition of discipline shall be made public in the manner prescribed by these rules. If the admission of misconduct is rejected by the court or the reviewing committee, it shall be with- drawn, shall not be made public, and shall not be used against the respondent in any subsequent proceedings. In that event, the matter shall be referred for further proceedings to a different judi- cial authority or reviewing committee, as appro- priate. (d) A respondent who tenders an admission of misconduct and, if applicable, enters with disci- plinary counsel into a proposed disposition of the matter, shall present to the court or the reviewing committee an affidavit stating the following: (1) That the admission of misconduct and, if applicable, the proposed disposition are freely and voluntarily submitted; that the respondent is not making the admission of misconduct and, if applicable, the proposed disposition, as a result of any threats or other coercion or duress, or any promises or other inducements not set forth in the proposed disposition; that the respondent is fully aware of the consequences of such submissions; (2) That the respondent is aware that there is presently pending a complaint, in connection with which probable cause has been found that the respondent committed the following acts of mis- conduct: (list specific acts); and (3) Either (A) that the respondent admits that the material facts alleged in the complaint, or in that portion thereof to which the respondent’s admission relates, are true, or (B) if the respon- dent denies some or all of such material facts, that the respondent acknowledges that there is 169 sufficient evidence to prove such material facts by clear and convincing evidence. (e) The disciplinary counsel may recommend dismissal of acts of misconduct alleged in the complaint that are not admitted by the respondent. The respondent’s admission of some acts of mis- conduct shall not foreclose the disciplinary coun- sel from pursuing discipline based upon other acts of misconduct alleged in the complaint. (f) Prior to acceptance by the court or the reviewing committee of the admission of miscon- duct, the proposed disposition of the matter, if applicable, and the imposition of any discipline, the complainant will be given the right to com- ment thereon. (g) In any disciplinary proceeding where the respondent already has other disciplinary matters pending before a court, either pursuant to an order of interim suspension under Section 2-42, or pur- suant to a presentment filed under Section 2-35, 2-40, 2-41 or 2-47, the respondent and disciplin- ary counsel may agree to a presentment. The respondent and disciplinary counsel shall stipu- late that the order of presentment is requested for the purpose of consolidating all pending disci- plinary matters before the court. (Adopted June 24, 2002, to take effect July 1, 2003; May 14, 2003, effective date changed to Oct. 1, 2003; Sept. 30, 2003, effective date changed to Jan. 1, 2004; amended June 26, 2006, to take effect Jan. 1, 2007.)