Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-266 (2026)

Short title: Connecticut Uniform Electronic Transactions Act

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 1-266 to 1-286, inclusive, shall be known and may be cited as the “Connecticut Uniform Electronic Transactions Act”.

(P.A. 02-68, S. 1.)

History: (Revisor's note: Quotation marks were inserted editorially by the Revisors for consistency and proper form).

See Secs. 7-35aa to 7-35gg, inclusive, re Uniform Real Property Electronic Recording Act.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2006–2024 · leading case: Peruta v. Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc., 913 A.2d 1160 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2006).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Peruta v. Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc., 913 A.2d 1160 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2006). · cites it 2× “The defendant asserts that this process of logging in constitutes a “signed statement” under the Connecticut Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, General Statutes § 1-266 et seq. Whether such entries constitute a “signature” 15 under the Connecticut Uniform Electronic…”

De Moura Castro v. Loanpal, LLC (D. Conn. 2024). · cites it 4× “The fact that someone from Loanpal was not physically present to witness Plaintiffs e-sign the Loanpal agreement is "irrelevant" because such a presence is not required under Connecticut's CUETA statute, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-266 , et seq. Doc. 51, at 13.”

Whinfield v. Capitas Distributors, Inc., 111 F. Supp. 3d 177 (D. Conn. 2015). · cites it 2× “Under the Connecticut Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (“CUETA”), Conn. Gen.Stat. §§ 1-266 et seq., the Maholchic-Whinfield exchange would also be sufficient to satisfy a signature requirement imposed by any statute, regulation, or other “law.”

Brent D. Benjamin v. Elizabeth D. Walker (W. Va. 2016). “2009); Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. §§ 1-266 to 286 (Wet 2007 & Supp.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.