Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-153 (2026)

Discrimination on the basis of sex, gender identity or expression or marital status prohibited

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
No local or regional board of education shall discriminate on the basis of sex, gender identity or expression or marital status in the employment of teachers in the public schools or in the determination of the compensation to be paid to such teachers.

(1949 Rev., S. 1440; P.A. 78-218, S. 102; P.A. 11-55, S. 9.)

History: P.A. 78-218 forbade discrimination on basis of sex, deleted reference to municipalities and specified local and regional school boards; P.A. 11-55 prohibited discrimination on basis of gender identity or expression.

Cited. 152 C. 151; 216 C. 253.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2026 · leading case: Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Bd. of Educ., 855 A.2d 212 (Conn. 2004).
Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Bd. of Educ., 855 A.2d 212 (Conn. 2004). · cites it 8× “*247 In addition, there is nothing legislatively unusual about there being separate and independent remedies for racial and other types of discrimination, concurrent with those afforded by the commission under its statutory scheme. For example, in the area of employment…”
Lieberman v. State Bd. of Labor Relations, 579 A.2d 505 (Conn. 1990). · cites it 2× “e attorney general, pursuant to General Statutes § 176, 4 petitioned the labor board for a declaratory ruling on the following question: “Whether and in what circumstances under the State Employee Relations Act [General Statutes §§ 5-270 through 5-280], the Municipal Employee…”
Montgomery Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Bd. of Educ., 534 A.2d 980 (Md. 1987). “2d 526, 533 (1972) (Conn.Gen.Stat. § 10-153(d) (1987)); Incorporated Village of Lynbrook v.”
Cichocki (D. Conn. 2026). · cites it 2× “Cichocki alleges the following Counts against SEA and CEA (collectively, “the Union”): Count One for prohibited practices and failure to represent under the Teacher Negotiation Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-153 ; Count Two for negligent misrepresentation; Count Three for promissory…”
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-153(d): 1 case
Montgomery Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Bd. of Educ., 534 A.2d 980 (Md. 1987). “2d 526, 533 (1972) (Conn.Gen.Stat. § 10-153(d) (1987)); Incorporated Village of Lynbrook v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.