Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 13a — HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES · Chapter 238 — Highway Construction and Maintenance
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 13a-81 (2026)

Relocation of persons, businesses and farms displaced by state highway construction

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 13a-81 is repealed.

(1957, P.A. 601; September, 1957, P.A. 22; 1958 Rev., S. 13-114; 1963, P.A. 226, S. 81; 1967, P.A. 108, S. 1; 1969, P.A. 503, S. 13.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Secs. 13a-81a to 13a-81l. Highway relocation assistance. (a) Sections 13a-81a to 13a-81l, inclusive, are repealed except that any payment or matter, due or pending, pursuant to said sections 13a-81a to 13a-81l, inclusive, shall be paid or handled in accordance with said sections, or regulations or procedures promulgated pursuant thereto.

(b) All rights or liabilities now existing under sections 13a-81a to 13a-81l, inclusive, and under regulations or procedures pursuant thereto shall not be affected by the repeal of such sections or portions thereof under subsection (a) of this section.

(1969, P.A. 503, S. 1–12; 1971, P.A. 838, S. 17.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1968–1972 · leading case: Slavitt v. Ives, 303 A.2d 13 (Conn. 1972).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Slavitt v. Ives, 303 A.2d 13 (Conn. 1972). · cites it 2× “It was not retroactive, however, and nothing in the 1967 statute can be said to apply in order to benefit the plaintiff.”
Smalls v. Ives, 296 F. Supp. 448 (D. Conn. 1968). · cites it 3× “§ 13a-81. However, these statutes do not provide such a right.”
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 13a-81(b): 1 case
Smalls v. Ives, 296 F. Supp. 448 (D. Conn. 1968). “§ 13a-81. However, these statutes do not provide such a right.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.