Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 16-248 (2026)

Rights of telephone company in operation May 23, 1985

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Every telephone company organized before May 23, 1985, under special or general law, for the transaction of a telephone exchange business, in whole or in part, is limited in its operation, so far as pertains to the telephone exchange business, to the limits of the town or towns in which the plant and structures of such company, association or corporation actually existed and were in operation, in whole or in part, on such date, except upon a finding that public convenience and necessity require an extension of such limits as hereinafter provided.

(1949 Rev., S. 5660; P.A. 85-187, S. 6, 15.)

History: P.A. 85-187 applied provisions of section to every telephone company organized before May 23, 1985, instead of to every company, association or corporation organized before May 3, 1899.

Secs. 16-249 to 16-250a. Authority finding re extension of exchange business of telephone company. Determination of public convenience and necessity for extension. Reselling or sharing of line purchased or leased from telephone company. Sections 16-249 to 16-250a, inclusive, are repealed, effective June 6, 2014.

(1949 Rev., S. 5661, 5662; P.A. 75-486, S. 1, 69; P.A. 77-614, S. 162, 610; P.A. 80-482, S. 110, 111, 348; P.A. 84-238; P.A. 85-187, S. 7, 8, 15; P.A. 11-80, S. 1; P.A. 14-134, S. 130.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1971–1971 · leading case: Hartford Elec. Light Co. v. Water Resources Comm'n, 291 A.2d 721 (Conn. 1971).
Hartford Elec. Light Co. v. Water Resources Comm'n, 291 A.2d 721 (Conn. 1971). ““In delegating exclusive jurisdiction over the construction and *94 reconstruction of facilities for the transmission of electricity to the public utilities commission (§16-248), the General Assembly obviously recognized the desirability that an agency with statewide…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.