Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17b-220 (2026)
(Formerly Sec. 17-292g). Reimbursement of medical providers
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 17b-220 is repealed, effective March 1, 2004.
(P.A. 86-415, S. 4, 10; May Sp. Sess. P.A. 92-16, S. 16, 89; P.A. 93-262, S. 1, 87; 93-418, S. 12, 41; P.A. 95-351, S. 12, 30; June 18 Sp. Sess. P.A. 97-2, S. 67, 165; June 30 Sp. Sess. P.A. 03-3, S. 97.)
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2002–2002 · leading case: New England Health Care, Employees Union, Dist. 1199 v. Rowland, 221 F. Supp. 2d 297 (D. Conn. 2002).
New England Health Care, Employees Union, Dist. 1199 v. Rowland, 221 F. Supp. 2d 297 (D. Conn. 2002). “; Conn.Gen.Stat. § 17b-220 et seq. Unlike the “purely proprietary” interests in Boston Harbor, the defendants in this case acted in accordance with government objectives regarding medical assistance programs.”
New England Health Care Employees Union, Dist. 1199 v. Rowland, 204 F. Supp. 2d 336 (D. Conn. 2002). “; Conn.Gen.Stat. § 17b-220 et seq. Therefore, unlike the “purely proprietary” interests of the defendants in Boston Harbor, the defendants in this case acted in accordance with government objectives regarding medical assistance programs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.