A person convicted of a crime who is incarcerated on or after July 1, 1993, who received a definite sentence of two years or less, and who has been confined under such sentence for not less than one-half of the sentence imposed by the court, less such time as may have been earned under the provisions of section
18-7,
18-7a,
18-98a,
18-98b or
18-98d or less any risk reduction credit earned under the provisions of section
18-98e, may be released pursuant to subsection (e) of section
18-100 or to any other community correction program approved by the Commissioner of Correction.
(P.A. 90-261, S. 4; P.A. 93-219, S. 1, 14; P.A. 11-51, S. 23.)
History: P.A. 93-219 expanded release eligibility to include prisoners who received a definite sentence of two years or less, rather than one year or less, and added references to Secs. 18-7a, 18-98a, 18-98b and 18-98d, effective July 1, 1993; P.A. 11-51 provided for deduction from sentence of any risk reduction credit earned under Sec. 18-98e, effective July 1, 2011.
See Sec. 54-125a re release on parole of inmates with sentences of more than two years.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2026 · leading case:
Velez v. Comm'r of Corr., 738 A.2d 604 (Conn. 1999).
Velez v. Comm'r of Corr., 738 A.2d 604 (Conn. 1999).
· cites it 16× “General Statutes § 18-100c provides: “A person convicted of a crime who is incarcerated on or after July 1, 1993, who received a definite sentence of two years or less, and who has been confined under such sentence for not less than one-half of the sentence imposed by the court,…”
Tyson v. Comm'r of Corr., 808 A.2d 653 (Conn. 2002).
· cites it 2× “93-219 [which is now codified at General Statutes § 54-124c] transferred from the department [of correction (department)] to an independent board of parole [(board)] the supervision of all persons released from the custody of the department, other than those granted community…”
State v. Pickel, 995 A.2d 125 (Conn. App. Ct. 2010).
· cites it 2× “1 See General Statutes § 18-100c. 2 Whether the defendant was absolutely or conditionally ordered out of the residence by his mother or stepfather was a disputed issue at trial.”
State v. Adam H., 735 A.2d 839 (Conn. App. Ct. 1999).
· cites it 2× “, General Statutes §§ 18-100c. 53a-28, 53a-35, 53a-35a.”
Pennyman (D. Conn. 2026).
“§ 18-100c. Similarly, most inmates “who received a definite sentence or total effective sentence of more than two years, and who ha[ve] been confined under such sentence or sentences for not less than one-half of the total effective sentence .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.