The terms “inmate” and “prisoner”, as used in this title and sections
54-125 to
54-129, inclusive, and
54-131, include any person in the custody of the Commissioner of Correction or confined in any institution or facility of the Department of Correction until released from such custody or control, including any person on parole.
(1967, P.A. 152, S. 12; P.A. 79-194; 79-631, S. 14, 111; P.A. 82-472, S. 154, 183.)
History: P.A. 79-194 deleted reference to Sec. 17-194a and replaced “sentenced or transferred to” with “in the custody of the commissioner ... or confined in” any institution or facility; P.A. 79-631 made technical changes; P.A. 82-472 removed the reference to Sec. 17-246.
Cited. 45 CS 57.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases (
3 in the last 5 years), 1996–2025 · leading case:
Wiseman v. Armstrong, 850 A.2d 114 (Conn. 2004).
Wiseman v. Armstrong, 850 A.2d 114 (Conn. 2004).
· cites it 2× “Under those statutes, before the aforementioned rights may be denied to an individual involuntarily, the court must set a hearing and give the subject individual notice of, inter alia, the time and place of the hearing, the facts alleged in the application for involuntary…”
Magee v. Comm'r of Corr., 937 A.2d 72 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008).
· cites it 2× “As a fundamental observation, inmates or prisoners are “in the custody of the Commissioner of Correction or confined in any institution or facility of the Department of Correction until released from such custody or control, including any person on parole.”
State v. Webber, 315 A.3d 320 (Conn. App. Ct. 2024).
· cites it 2× “’’; General Statutes § 18-84; and the latter as ‘‘any person found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect pursuant to section 53a-13 .”
Coleman v. Comm'r of Corr., 231 Conn. App. 223 (Conn. App. Ct. 2025).
· cites it 3× “However, 5 General Statutes § 18-84 provides: ‘‘The terms ‘inmate’ and ‘prisoner’, as used in this title and sections 54-125 to 54-129, inclusive, and 54-131, include any person in the custody of the Commissioner of Correction or confined in any institution or facility of the…”
Jones v. Schortman (D. Conn. 2023).
· cites it 4× “§ 18-81 , Conn. Gen. Stat. § 18-84 , Conn. Gen. Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.