Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 19a — PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELL-BEING · Chapter 368x — AIDS Testing and Medical Information
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 19a-590 (2026)

Liability for violations

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Any person, except as otherwise provided in this chapter, who wilfully violates any provision of this chapter shall be liable in a private cause of action for injuries suffered as a result of such violation. Upon a finding that an individual has been injured as a result of such violation, damages shall be assessed in the amount sufficient to compensate said individual for such injury.

(P.A. 89-246, S. 10.)

Cited. 236 C. 845.

Cited. 38 CA 360.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1995–2021 · leading case: Doe v. Marselle, 675 A.2d 835 (Conn. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Doe v. Marselle, 675 A.2d 835 (Conn. 1996). · cites it 13× “General Statutes § 19a-590 provides: “Liability for violations.”
Doe v. Marselle, 660 A.2d 871 (Conn. App. Ct. 1995). · cites it 10× “) General Statutes § 19a-590. The first issue before us is whether the plaintiff has alleged that Flores wilfully violated § 19a-583, 3 which, with exceptions not relevant here, prohibits disclosure of HIV-related information.”
State v. Bemer, 339 Conn. 528 (Conn. 2021). · cites it 2× “The provisions of sections 19a-581 to 19a-585, inclu- sive, and section 19a-590, except any provision requiring the subject of an HIV-related test to provide informed consent prior to the performance of such test and any provision that would prohibit or limit the disclosure of…”
State v. Bemer (Conn. 2021). · cites it 4× “5 In addition to General Statutes §§ 19a-581 through 19a-585, General Stat- utes § 19a-590 is also incorporated by reference in § 54-102a (b) and does not deal with consent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.