Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 02 — GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND LEGISLATIVE AGENCIES · Chapter 21 — Legislative Intern Program
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 2-82 (2026)

Duties and powers of committee

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The agencies of the Legislative Department and the State Librarian shall assist the committee on request. Said committee shall recruit, select, supervise and appoint interns and assign them to members of the General Assembly to assist in the performance of their duties. Said committee shall coordinate the legislative intern program with the public and private institutions of higher education in Connecticut. Said committee shall have the authority to make application for and receive grants from any governmental agency and any charitable foundation. Said committee shall have such other powers as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

(1969, P.A. 769, S. 3, 4; P.A. 11-208, S. 2.)

History: P.A. 11-208 deleted provisions re appointment of a secretary and assignment of interns to legislative committees or legislative agencies, effective July 1, 2011.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2021 · leading case: Stewart v. Town of Watertown, 38 A.3d 72 (Conn. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stewart v. Town of Watertown, 38 A.3d 72 (Conn. 2012). · cites it 6× “161 (1916), is applicable to the plaintiff, and specific state statutes regarding the office of town clerk do not apply; and (2) chapter 2, article III, § 2-82 of the Watertown code of ordinances 6 (town ordinance), *709 which provides the compensation and fringe benefits due to…”
Disciplinary Couns. v. Cannatelli, 203 Conn. App. 236 (Conn. App. Ct. 2021). · cites it 3× “On November 22, 2019, pursuant to Practice Book § 2-82 (a) and (b), the parties executed a stipulation and submitted it to the court for approval on November 25, 2019 (stipulation).”
Disciplinary Couns. v. Serafinowicz, 160 Conn. App. 92 (Conn. App. Ct. 2015). · cites it 2× “3 Pursuant to Practice Book § 2-82 (c), the matter was submitted to the court for imposition of sanctions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.