The inland wetlands and watercourses of the state of Connecticut are an indispensable and irreplaceable but fragile natural resource with which the citizens of the state have been endowed. The wetlands and watercourses are an interrelated web of nature essential to an adequate supply of surface and underground water; to hydrological stability and control of flooding and erosion; to the recharging and purification of groundwater; and to the existence of many forms of animal, aquatic and plant life. Many inland wetlands and watercourses have been destroyed or are in danger of destruction because of unregulated use by reason of the deposition, filling or removal of material, the diversion or obstruction of water flow, the erection of structures and other uses, all of which have despoiled, polluted and eliminated wetlands and watercourses. Such unregulated activity has had, and will continue to have, a significant, adverse impact on the environment and ecology of the state of Connecticut and has and will continue to imperil the quality of the environment thus adversely affecting the ecological, scenic, historic and recreational values and benefits of the state for its citizens now and forever more. The preservation and protection of the wetlands and watercourses from random, unnecessary, undesirable and unregulated uses, disturbance or destruction is in the public interest and is essential to the health, welfare and safety of the citizens of the state. It is, therefore, the purpose of sections
22a-36 to
22a-45, inclusive, to protect the citizens of the state by making provisions for the protection, preservation, maintenance and use of the inland wetlands and watercourses by minimizing their disturbance and pollution; maintaining and improving water quality in accordance with the highest standards set by federal, state or local authority; preventing damage from erosion, turbidity or siltation; preventing loss of fish and other beneficial aquatic organisms, wildlife and vegetation and the destruction of the natural habitats thereof; deterring and inhibiting the danger of flood and pollution; protecting the quality of wetlands and watercourses for their conservation, economic, aesthetic, recreational and other public and private uses and values; and protecting the state's potable fresh water supplies from the dangers of drought, overdraft, pollution, misuse and mismanagement by providing an orderly process to balance the need for the economic growth of the state and the use of its land with the need to protect its environment and ecology in order to forever guarantee to the people of the state, the safety of such natural resources for their benefit and enjoyment and for the benefit and enjoyment of generations yet unborn.
(1972, P.A. 155, S. 1.)
Cited. 179 C. 250; 180 C. 421; Id., 692. To interpret Sec. 22a-430 as precluding municipal regulation of sewerage systems would clearly work to undermine some of the basic purposes of the act as expressed in statute. 183 C. 532. Cited. 186 C. 67; 193 C. 414; 196 C. 218; 203 C. 525; 209 C. 544; Id., 652; 211 C. 416; 212 C. 710; Id., 727; 213 C. 604; 216 C. 320; 217 C. 164; 218 C. 703; 219 C. 404; 220 C. 362; Id., 476; 226 C. 579; 227 C. 71; Id., 175; 228 C. 95; 229 C. 247; Id., 627; Id., 654; 235 C. 448; 242 C. 335. Although one of the broad purposes of act is to prevent “loss of fish and other beneficial aquatic organisms, wildlife and vegetation”, when viewed in context of the act as a whole, the intent to protect wildlife is a secondary effect of protecting the wetlands and watercourses themselves. 266 C. 150. Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Act does not provide inland wetlands agencies with jurisdiction to regulate activities that solely affect the wildlife that uses the wetlands and watercourses without affecting the wetlands or watercourses themselves. 269 C. 57.
Cited. 4 CA 271; 5 CA 70; 6 CA 715; 12 CA 47; 15 CA 336; 18 CA 440; 19 CA 713; 20 CA 309; 25 CA 446; 26 CA 564; 27 CA 590; 28 CA 262; Id., 780; 29 CA 12; Id., 105; 30 CA 85; 31 CA 105; Id., 599; judgment reversed, see 229 C. 627; 32 CA 799; 34 CA 385; 36 CA 270; 37 CA 166.
Cited. 32 CS 104. Under Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Act, commissioner is limited to promulgating regulations and appealing from decisions of municipal commissions. 35 CS 145. Nothing obligates commissioner to include “balancing computation” in his opinion relative to economic factors described in section at risk of nullification of his entire action; section must yield to Sec. 22a-41 for factors to be considered. 36 CS 1. Cited. 41 CS 444; 42 CS 57.
Notes of Decisions
Mario v. Town of Fairfield, 585 A.2d 87 (Conn. 1991).
· cites it 16× “” General Statutes § 22a-36. Accordingly, the broad legislative objectives underlying the IWWA are in part “to protect the citizens of the state by making provisions for the protection, preservation, maintenance and use of the inland wetlands and watercourses by minimizing their…”
Conservation Comm'n v. Price, 479 A.2d 187 (Conn. 1984).
· cites it 10× “The plaintiff, the Simsbury conservation commission (commission), brought this action seeking to enjoin the defendants from continuing to conduct an activity on the defendants’ property in violation of the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses *416 Act; General Statutes §§ 22a-36…”
Samperi v. Inland Wetlands Agency, 628 A.2d 1286 (Conn. 1993).
· cites it 6× “The legislative purpose of the act is described in General Statutes § 22a-36, which contains the legislative finding regarding wetlands.”
Queach Corp. v. Inland Wetlands Comm'n, 779 A.2d 134 (Conn. 2001).
· cites it 10× “This appeal requires this court to address whether the regulatory amendments adopted by the named defendant inland wetlands commission of the town of Branford (commission) are valid under General Statutes §§ 22a-36 1 through *181 22a-45* 2 of the Connecticut Inland Wetlands and…”
Aaron v. Conservation Comm'n, 441 A.2d 30 (Conn. 1981).
· cites it 8× “General Statutes § 22a-36, which is entitled “Inland Wetlands and Water Courses.”
Windels v. Env't Prot. Comm'n, 933 A.2d 256 (Conn. 2007).
· cites it 6× “, and the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Act (IWWA), General Statutes § 22a-36 et seq., to bring this *271 action against the defendants, the environmental protection commission of the town of Darien, the planning and zoning commission of the town of Darien, and Hart…”
Finley v. Inland Wetlands Com'n of Town of Orange, 959 A.2d 569 (Conn. 2008).
· cites it 8× “f the trial court denying their appeal pursuant to General Statutes § 22a-43 [2] from the decision of the named defendant, the inland wetlands commission of the town of Orange (commission), granting the application of the defendant Stew Leonard's Orange, LLC (Stew Leonard's),…”
Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation Comm'n, 563 A.2d 1339 (Conn. 1989).
· cites it 5× “The applicants applied to the commission for a class B 3 inland wetlands permit pursuant to “The Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Act”; General Statutes § 22a-36 et seq. (wetlands act); and § 5 of the Glastonbury Inland Wetland and Watercourse Regulations, to construct a roadway…”
Nizzardo v. State Traffic Comm'n, 788 A.2d 1158 (Conn. 2002).
· cites it 4× “, 248. At the administrative hearing before the board, one plaintiff, the Better Neighborhood Association of Stamford (neighborhood association), intervened pursuant to § 22a-19.”
Cioffoletti v. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 552 A.2d 796 (Conn. 1989).
· cites it 5× “that the plaintiffs received a fair hearing; (3) that the defendant may regulate activity in nonwetlands areas that affects wetlands areas; (4) that the defendant has the authority to require a performance bond; and (5) that the defendant’s action has not violated…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.