Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 25 — WATER RESOURCES. FLOOD AND EROSION CONTROL · Chapter 473 — Water Resources
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 25-7 (2026)

Use or obstruction of navigable waters. Certificate

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 25-7 is repealed.

(1949 Rev., S. 3571; 1963, P.A. 569, S. 6.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Secs. 25-7a to 25-7f and 25-8. Transferred to Chapter 446i, Secs. 22a-358 to 22a-364, inclusive.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Secs. 25-8a to 25-8e. Diversion of river waters for public or domestic use. Action on application for permit. Revocation or modification of permit. Appeal. Committee to determine and award damages. Sections 25-8a to 25-8e, inclusive, are repealed.

(1967, P.A. 792, S. 1–5; 1971, P.A. 870, S. 78; 872, S. 62–66; P.A. 75-486, S. 58, 69; P.A. 76-436, S. 467, 681; P.A. 77-603, S. 107, 125; 77-614, S. 162, 323, 610; P.A. 80-482, S. 182, 348; P.A. 82-402, S. 15, 16.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1971–2024 · leading case: Hartford Elec. Light Co. v. Water Resources Comm'n, 291 A.2d 721 (Conn. 1971).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hartford Elec. Light Co. v. Water Resources Comm'n, 291 A.2d 721 (Conn. 1971). · cites it 9× “found an adverse effect on (1) navigability, (2) any right of the state or (3) increased hazards from flood waters.”
Hepburn v. Brill, 312 A.3d 1 (Conn. 2024). · cites it 3× “led to comply with the rule of practice (§ 10-60) governing amendments to pleadings in civil matters, but visitation is governed by the less restrictive rule of practice (§ 25- 7) pertaining to amendments to pleadings in family matters, and, because the trial court should have…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.