Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 3-4 (2026)
Executive secretary and clerk; executive journal
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 3-4 is repealed, effective October 1, 2002.
(1949 Rev., S. 80, 3586, subs. (7); S.A. 02-12, S. 1.)
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1981–2019 · leading case: Thalheim v. Town of Greenwich, 775 A.2d 947 (Conn. 2001).
Thalheim v. Town of Greenwich, 775 A.2d 947 (Conn. 2001). “” Practice Book § 3-4 provides: “Filing Appearance with the Clerk—Copies “Appearances shall be filed with the clerk of the court location where the matter is pending.”
Damora v. Christ-Janer, 441 A.2d 61 (Conn. 1981). “) § 3-4, p. 111. Professor Corbin notes that in determining the issue of whether the parties have made a contract, “there is no ‘parol evidence rule’ to be applied.”
State v. Santiago, 513 A.2d 710 (Conn. App. Ct. 1986). “’ ” 1 LaFave & Israel, Criminal Procedure § 3-4 (f), quoting State v. Muldowney, 60 N.”
Lucy v. Bay Area Credit Svc LLC, 792 F. Supp. 2d 320 (D. Conn. 2011). “Collection Agreement, §§ 3-4, 6. The Collection Agreement expires on June 30, 2012.”
State v. Browne, 933 A.2d 735 (Conn. App. Ct. 2007). “3 “The particularity clause of the fourth amendment requires that no warrants issue except those particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
DeMayo v. Quinn (Conn. 2014). “The defendant further asserts that interpreting the city charter so as to require the mayor to recommend the candidate for corporation counsel conflicts with § 3-4 of the Meriden City Code (code), which requires the city council to appoint certain officers at the first meeting…”
Configair LLC v. Kurz (D. Conn. 2019). “¢§ 3-4.) Beginning in 2012, Kurz agreed to allow the Company to market HKC’s Pre-LLC Software.”
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 3-4(f): 1 case
State v. Browne, 933 A.2d 735 (Conn. App. Ct. 2007). “3 “The particularity clause of the fourth amendment requires that no warrants issue except those particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.