Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 3-7 (2026)

Cancellation of uncollectible claims. Compromise of disputed claims

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, any uncollectible claim for an amount of five thousand dollars or less may be cancelled upon the books of any state department or agency upon the authorization of the head of such department or agency. Any uncollectible costs in an amount less than five thousand dollars incurred by the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection pursuant to section 22a-451, for investigating, containing, removing, monitoring or mitigating pollution and contamination, emergency or hazardous waste may be cancelled by the commissioner, in accordance with procedures approved by the State Comptroller.

(b) The Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management may authorize the cancellation upon the books of any state department or agency of any uncollectible claim for an amount greater than five thousand dollars due to such department or agency.

(c) Upon the recommendation of the Attorney General, the Governor may authorize the compromise of any disputed claim by or against the state or any department or agency thereof, and shall certify to the proper officer or department or agency of the state the amount to be received or paid under such compromise. Such certificate shall constitute sufficient authority to such officer or department or agency to pay or receive the amount therein specified in full settlement of such claim. The record of any compromise effected pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be open to public inspection in accordance with section 1-210.

(1949 Rev., S. 103; P.A. 73-333; P.A. 81-232; 81-374, S. 1, 4; P.A. 82-412, S. 1, 2; P.A. 85-613, S. 11, 154; P.A. 87-299, S. 1, 2; P.A. 91-120; P.A. 97-203, S. 14, 20; 97-241, S. 2, 5; P.A. 98-204, S. 1, 2; P.A. 11-80, S. 1; P.A. 22-118, S. 161.)

History: P.A. 73-333 required records of compromise decisions be open to public inspection; P.A. 81-232 permitted cancellation of uncollectible claims due to state departments and agencies by the department or agency head if the amount of the claim is less than $20 where previously all cancellations were authorized by governor and included references to state agencies in addition to departments; P.A. 81-374, effective July 1, 1981, added Subsec. (b) authorizing cancellation of uncollectible patient claims, not exceeding $400, owed to The University of Connecticut health center; P.A. 82-412 amended section to allow cancellation of claims of $50 or less, rather than $20 or less, by agency or department head; P.A. 85-613 made technical change, deleting reference to Sec. 1-20 in Subsec. (a); P.A. 87-299 amended Subsec. (a) by increasing the amount of uncollectible claim due any state department or agency which may be cancelled by the head of such department or agency from $50 or less to $200 or less, except for the department of revenue services where the maximum amount which may be so cancelled was continued at $50; P.A. 91-120 increased the level of uncollectible claims which can be cancelled by the department of revenue services from $50 to $200 and rewrote the section for clarity; P.A. 97-203 amended Subsec. (b) to replace Attorney General with the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management re recommendation to the Governor, effective July 1, 1997; P.A. 97-241 amended Subsec. (a) to provide that the Commissioner of Environmental Protection may cancel uncollectible claims of less than $5,000 incurred by him under Sec. 22a-451, effective June 24, 1997; P.A. 98-204 amended Subsec. (a) by increasing the amount of uncollectible claim due any state department or agency which may be cancelled by the head of such department or agency from $200 or less to $1,000 or less and deleting provision that uncollectible patient claim due The University of Connecticut Health Center of $400 or less may be cancelled upon the authorization of the Board of Trustees of The University of Connecticut, amended Subsec. (b) by providing that the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management, rather than the Governor, upon the recommendation of said secretary, may authorize cancellation of uncollectible claim for $1,000, rather than $200, and deleting provision concerning cancellation of uncollectible patient claims greater than $400 due The University of Connecticut Health Center, effective July 1, 1998; pursuant to P.A. 11-80, “Commissioner of Environmental Protection” was changed editorially by the Revisors to “Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection” in Subsec. (a), effective July 1, 2011; P.A. 22-118 amended Subsec. (a) by increasing amount of uncollectible claim due any state department or agency which may be cancelled by the head of such department or agency from $1,000 or less to $5,000 or less and amended Subsec. (b) by increasing amount secretary may authorize cancellation of uncollectible claims from greater than $1,000 to greater than $5,000, effective May 7, 2022.

The legislature did not intend for Governor's authorization to pay amount specified in a settlement to create mandatory duty for department official to pay. 284 C. 250.

Arbitration clause in state contract not invalidated by section. 28 CS 173.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1968–2022 · leading case: C. R. Klewin Ne., LLC v. Fleming, 932 A.2d 1053 (Conn. 2007).
C. R. Klewin Ne., LLC v. Fleming, 932 A.2d 1053 (Conn. 2007). · cites it 44× “The defendants contend that the state has not consented to be sued under General Statutes § 3-7 (c), 1 the statute pursuant to which the trial court issued the writ, and that the exception to sovereign immunity in actions for declaratory or injunctive relief when officials have…”
Cheshire Taxpayers' Action Comm., Inc. v. Guilford, 474 A.2d 97 (Conn. 1984). · cites it 5× “3 This petition was circulated pursuant to the power of initiative reserved to the electors by § 3-7 of the town of Cheshire charter. 4 The town clerk, in accordance with the char *3 ter, certified the petition to the town council.”
Dep't of Pub. Works v. Ecap Constr. Co., 737 A.2d 398 (Conn. 1999). · cites it 4× “*556 According to the department, however, PiotrowsM’s settlement offer was only a tentative one, subject to approval by the department’s commissioner and the formal approval process required under General Statutes § 3-7 (c). 3 Such approval was never obtained, and the…”
Thalheim v. Town of Greenwich, 775 A.2d 947 (Conn. 2001). · cites it 2× “’ ” Practice Book § 3-7 provides in relevant part: “Consequence of Filing Appearance “(a) Except by leave of the judicial authority, no attorney shall be permitted to appear in court or to be heard in behalf of a party until the attorney’s appearance has been entered.”
Presidential Capital Corp. v. Reale, 652 A.2d 489 (Conn. 1994). “1980) § 3-7, p. 118 (“[i]f there is sufficient evidence of price based on .”
Toffolon v. Town of Avon, 378 A.2d 580 (Conn. 1977). “2d 893 -902, §§ 3-7; 27 Am. Jur. 2d, Eminent Domain, § 320.”
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Fritzell, 198 A.3d 642 (Conn. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “10 See Practice Book § 3-7 (b). Thus, notices sent to that address reasonably were calculated to notify the defendant of the action, and therefore the court did not deprive the defendant of due process.”
Rosenthal Law Firm, LLC v. Cohen, 210 A.3d 579 (Conn. App. Ct. 2019). “2d 713 ; see Practice Book § 3-7 (a) ("[e]xcept by leave of the judicial authority, no attorney shall be permitted to appear in court or to be heard on behalf of a party until the attorney's appearance has been entered").”
Jones v. Ippoliti, 727 A.2d 713 (Conn. App. Ct. 1999). “” Practice Book § 3-7 (a). Because Pepe and Hazard did not enter an appearance on behalf of the plaintiffs, it did not represent them in this action.”
Aldin Assocs. Ltd. P'ship v. State, 209 Conn. App. 741 (Conn. App. Ct. 2022). · cites it 3× “On appeal to our Supreme Court, the defendants claimed, inter alia, that ‘‘the plaintiff’s action [was] barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity because (a) the action is tantamount to an action for money damages, and (b) the defendants did not act in excess of any statutory…”
C. R. Klewin Ne., LLC v. State, 9 A.3d 326 (Conn. 2010). · cites it 2× “” 8 General Statutes § 3-7 (c) provides in relevant part: “Upon the recommendation of the Attorney General, the Governor may authorize the compromise of any disputed claim by or against the state or any department or agency thereof, and shall certify to the proper officer or…”
Statewide Grievance Comm. v. Gifford, 820 A.2d 309 (Conn. App. Ct. 2003). “By presenting to the court (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) a pleading, written motion, or other paper, an attorney .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.