Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-294 (2026)
Notice of injury and of claim for compensation
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 31-294 is repealed.
(1949 Rev., S. 7426, 7442; 1953, 1955, S. 3041d; 1958, S. 31-157, 31-168; 1959, P.A. 387; 580, S. 8; 1961, P.A. 491, S. 16; 1963, P.A. 642, S. 36; 1967, P.A. 842, S. 3; 1969, P.A. 692; P.A. 80-124, S. 5; P.A. 81-472, S. 67, 159; P.A. 82-472, S. 108, 183; P.A. 85-133, S. 2; 85-184, S. 1; P.A. 87-160, S. 1; P.A. 88-357, S. 19; P.A. 89-371, S. 22; P.A. 90-116, S. 5; P.A. 91-32, S. 40, 41.)
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 78
cases, 1966–2019 · leading case: Discuillo v. Stone & Webster, 698 A.2d 873 (Conn. 1997).
Discuillo v. Stone & Webster, 698 A.2d 873 (Conn. 1997). “to 1981]) § 31-294 3 time limitations. *573 “On December 13, 1993, the commissioner issued his findings and award.”
Crochiere v. Bd. of Educ. of Town of Enfield, 630 A.2d 1027 (Conn. 1993). “to 1989) § 31-294; (3) mental injury without a physical component is not compensable; (4) mental injury resulting from termination is not compensable; (5) mental injury resulting from a deviation from employment or will ful and serious misconduct is not compensable; and (6) the…”
Rice v. Vermilyn Brown, Inc., 657 A.2d 616 (Conn. 1995). “to 1985) § 31-294, 8 the pertinent provision of the act in force on December 12,1986, when the claimant’s lung disease first was diagnosed.”
Ciarlelli v. TOWN OF HAMDEN, 8 A.3d 1093 (Conn. 2010). “The town then appealed the board's decision to the Appellate Session of the Superior Court claiming that the plaintiff was barred from recovering benefits under § 7-433c because he did not comply with the notice provisions contained in General Statutes § 31-294, which is now…”
Pokorny v. Getta's Garage, 594 A.2d 446 (Conn. 1991). “General Statutes § 31-294 provides: “notice of injury and of claim for compensation, (a) Any employee who has sustained an injury in the course of his employment shall forthwith notify his employer, or some person representing his employer, of such injury; and on his failure to…”
Dubois v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., 607 A.2d 431 (Conn. 1992). “The defendant has appealed the review division’s decision, claiming that it improperly: (1) concluded that the notice of claim given in the present case satisfied the address requirements of General Statutes § 31-294; 1 and (2) failed to apply General Statutes § 31-297 (b), as…”
Burge v. Town of Stonington, 594 A.2d 945 (Conn. 1991). “In September, 1988, when the employee was injured, General Statutes § 31-294 provided in pertinent part: “The pecuniary liability of the employer for the medical and surgical service herein required shall be limited to such charges as prevail in the same community or similar…”
Collins v. City of West Haven, 555 A.2d 981 (Conn. 1989). “General Statutes § 31-294 sets out four exceptions where written notice of a claim is unnecessary.”
Black v. London & Egazarian Assocs., Inc., 620 A.2d 176 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993). “to 1983) *297 § 31-294, 2 (3) failed to find that the commissioner improperly refused to allow the plaintiff to present rebuttal testimony, and (4) affirmed the commissioner’s conclusion that the death of the plaintiff’s husband did not arise out of his employment.”
Chambers v. Elec. Boat Corp., 930 A.2d 653 (Conn. 2007). “to 1979) § 31-294, 2 which was repealed and is presently codified at General Statutes § 31-294c (a), to deprive the commissioner of subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiffs claim for dependent’s benefits under General Statutes (Rev.”
Skrzypiec v. Noonan, 633 A.2d 716 (Conn. 1993). “to 1987) § 31-294 and was receiving such benefits during the entire course of his treatment.”
Cummings v. Twin Mfg., Inc., 614 A.2d 857 (Conn. App. Ct. 1992). “The review division also determined that the commissioner’s ruling was proper because General Statutes § 31-294 permits him to order such changes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.