Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 32-220 (2026)
Short title: Economic Development and Manufacturing Assistance Act of 1990
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sections 32-220 to 32-234, inclusive, shall be known and may be cited as the “Economic Development and Manufacturing Assistance Act of 1990”.
(P.A. 90-270, S. 1, 38.)
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2001–2004 · leading case: Ne. Ct. Econ. All., Inc. v. ATC P'ship, 776 A.2d 1068 (Conn. 2001).
Ne. Ct. Econ. All., Inc. v. ATC P'ship, 776 A.2d 1068 (Conn. 2001). “For several years prior to the taking in 1994, the plaintiffs and the defendant had been actively involved in a nonadversarial effort to obtain governmental funding for the rehabilitation and redevelopment of the property pursuant to the Economic Development and Manufacturing…”
Bugryn v. City of Bristol, 774 A.2d 1042 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001). “The plaintiffs claim that the court improperly (1) concluded that the defendants did not violate the plaintiffs’ state and federal constitutional rights, (2) concluded that the defen *100 dants did not act in excess of the authority conferred on them by the Economic Development…”
ATC P'ship v. Town of Windham, 845 A.2d 389 (Conn. 2004). “With no intent to revive mill operations, the plaintiff thereafter entered into a cooperative relationship with Windham and Northeast in order to secure governmental funding, pursuant to the Economic Development and Manufacturing Assistance Act of 1990; General Statutes §§…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.