Any insurer authorized to issue an automobile liability insurance policy may, pending the issue of such a policy, make an agreement, for a period which shall not exceed sixty days, to be known as a binder, or may, in lieu of such a policy, issue a renewal endorsement or evidence of renewal of an existing policy. The provisions of sections
38a-334 to
38a-336a, inclusive,
38a-338, and
38a-340 to
38a-345, inclusive, shall apply to such binders, renewal endorsements or evidences of renewal.
(1967, P.A. 510, S. 6; P.A. 87-209; P.A. 89-48, S. 2; P.A. 93-297, S. 19, 29.)
History: P.A. 87-209 provided that the provisions of Secs. 38-175f to 38-175h, inclusive, and 38-175j and 38-175k are applicable to binders, renewal endorsements and other evidences of renewal; P.A. 89-48 increased to 60 the number of days a binder may be effective; Sec. 38-175e transferred to Sec. 38a-340 in 1991; P.A. 93-297 added reference to Sec. 38a-336a, effective January 1, 1994, and applicable to acts or omissions occurring on or after said date.
Annotations to former section 38-175e:
Cited. 160 C. 280. Regulations under statute make “other insurance” clauses in conflict with the regulations. 161 C. 169. Cited. 169 C. 502; overruled with respect to holding an uninsured motorist coverage, see 219 C. 371; 171 C. 252; Id., 463; 203 C. 45; Id., 258.
Cited. 31 CS 229; 36 CS 256, 260.
Annotations to present section:
Cited. 234 C. 182.
Cited. 25 CA 492; judgment reversed, see 222 C. 744. Section did not require insurer to issue cancellation notice in accordance with Sec. 38a-343 before terminating plaintiff's policy. 52 CA 497.
Notes of Decisions
Munroe v. Great Am. Ins., 661 A.2d 581 (Conn. 1995).
· cites it 4× “…to issue a temporary policy, known as a binder, pending its undertaking of permanent insurance coverage. Under § 38a-340, a binder may not be issued for a period exceeding sixty days, and its provisions must comply with the legislative mandates of General Statutes §§…”
Kane v. Am. Ins., 725 A.2d 1000 (Conn. App. Ct. 1999).
· cites it 3× “4 Kane alleges that pursuant to General Statutes § § 38a-340 and 38a-341 (2), the mailing of the automobile renewal policy by the defendant constituted the issu- *500 anee of a six month renewal policy requiring the defendant to issue a cancellation notice in accordance with the…”
Demchak v. State, 849 A.2d 1 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2003).
“The question reserved for the court in relevant part was: “Did [General Statutes] §§ 38a-340 and 38a-341 (2) require the defendant .”
Kane v. Am. Ins., 732 A.2d 775 (Conn. 1999).
· cites it 2× “497 (AC 18201), is granted, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes §§ 38a-340 and 38a-341 (2) did not require the defendant, American Insurance Company, to issue a cancellation notice in accordance with the provisions of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.