Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 47a — LANDLORD AND TENANT · Chapter 832 — Summary Process
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47a-26e (2026)

Order of payments on appeal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
If an order of payments is in effect on the date of judgment in the trial court and an appeal is taken by any party, the order shall remain in effect and compliance with the order shall constitute satisfactory compliance with the bond requirement of section 47a-35a.

(P.A. 79-571, S. 56; P.A. 93-209, S. 2.)

History: P.A. 93-209 provided that the order shall remain in effect if an appeal is taken by “any party”, rather than “the defendant”.

Cited. 38 CS 70; 40 CS 53.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1984–2004 · leading case: Ossen v. Wanat, 585 A.2d 685 (Conn. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ossen v. Wanat, 585 A.2d 685 (Conn. 1991). · cites it 2× “If the defendant fails to plead within three days after receipt of such motion by the clerk, the court shall forthwith enter judgment that the complainant recover possession or occupancy with his costs.”
Gray v. Coan (In Re Spiro), 305 B.R. 142 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2004). · cites it 4× “In helping to clarify the distinction between the estate’s interest in the Fund with ownership of the Fund itself, it is worth noting the striking similarity between an appellate bond and the use and occupancy payments ordered under state law.”
Wyngate, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc., 480 A.2d 616 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1984). · cites it 2× “The plaintiff claims that General Statutes § 47a-26e 1 is the only statutory provision which requires the continuation of the payments for use and occupancy post-judgment and that this statutory section only applies where an appeal is taken by a tenant, not by a landlord.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.