Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 51 — COURTS · Chapter 885 — Circuit Court
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-265 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Transferred to Chapter 895, Sec. 52-6a.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 41 cases, 1961–1977 · leading case: Prevedini v. Mobil Oil Corp., 320 A.2d 797 (Conn. 1973).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Prevedini v. Mobil Oil Corp., 320 A.2d 797 (Conn. 1973). · cites it 3× “[§ 51-265]; Levay v. Levay, 137 Conn. 92, 95 , 75 A.”
State v. Phillips, 353 A.2d 706 (Conn. 1974). · cites it 3× “The state’s appeal to the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court was authorized at that time by § 51-265 of the General Statutes which permitted “[ajppeals from *645 any final judgment or action of the circuit court .”
State v. Assuntino, 376 A.2d 1091 (Conn. 1977). · cites it 2× “74-183, was the act which implemented a broad plan of court reorganization, merging the former Circuit Court with the Court of Common Pleas, and establishing a procedure whereby most appeals from the judgments of the Court of Common Pleas would be taken to an Appellate Session…”
Black v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp., 187 A.2d 243 (Conn. 1962). · cites it 2× “Prom the denial of the petition, Black appealed to the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court, claiming that the trial court’s conclusions were unsupported by the subordinate facts.”
State v. Falzone, 370 A.2d 988 (Conn. 1976). · cites it 2× “Section 30 of the same act became § 51-265 of the General Statutes, and stated in part: “Appeals from any final judgment or action of the circuit court .”
Lapuk v. Blount, 198 A.2d 233 (Conn. App. Ct. 1963). · cites it 3× “General Statutes § 51-265. It also appears that § 441 of the 1951 Practice Book, relating to motions to reargue, is not among the rules of the Supreme Court of Errors made applicable, by reference, to appeals to this court.”
State v. Amara, 206 A.2d 438 (Conn. 1964). · cites it 2× “The function of the Appellate Division is to review errors of law; General Statutes § 51-265; not to conjure up speculative defenses.”
State v. Criscuolo, 268 A.2d 374 (Conn. 1970). · cites it 2× “See General Statutes § 51-265. The certification was limited to a review of certain claimed errors in the trial court’s instructions to the jury.”
State v. Cullum, 176 A.2d 587 (Conn. 1961). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 51-265. A rule implementing the statute specifies that certification is not a matter of right *730 but of sound judicial discretion.”
Kerite Co. v. Alpha Emp. Agency, Inc., 352 A.2d 288 (Conn. 1974). · cites it 2× “…the judgment of the trial court in accordance with this opinion. In this opinion the other judges concurred. 1 See General Statutes § 51-265.”
Stroman v. Gilbert, 197 A.2d 99 (Conn. App. Ct. 1963). · cites it 2× “Our statute, § 52-435, gives this right as follows: “If the court fails to find probable cause, *181 such finding shall be a bar to any further proceeding for the same cause of action, provided the complainant shall be allowed to appeal as provided in section 51-265.” (Prior to…”
State v. Saavedra, 253 A.2d 677 (Conn. App. Ct. 1968). · cites it 2× “Moreover, the defendant makes no mention of any errors committed at the hearing; his only claim is that his appeal was vacated by the court and he was ordered to serve the unexpired portion of the sentence.”
Show all 41 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.