Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-110 (2026)

Summoning in of third parties by defendant who counterclaims

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When a counterclaim raises questions affecting the interests of third parties, the defendant may, and if required by the court shall, cause the third parties to be summoned in as parties to the action.

(1949 Rev., S. 7832; P.A. 82-160, S. 45.)

History: P.A. 82-160 rephrased section.

Defendant cannot cite in parties whose legal relation is only to himself, by raising issues which do not affect the judgment to be rendered. 50 C. 583. Cited. 68 C. 157.

Cited. 25 CA 251; 41 CA 754.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2024 · leading case: Fam. Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Spencer, 677 A.2d 479 (Conn. App. Ct. 1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Fam. Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Spencer, 677 A.2d 479 (Conn. App. Ct. 1996). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to Practice Book § 102 and General Statutes § 52-110, the trial court granted the defendant’s morion to cite in the Masottas as counterclaim defendants.”

Clue v. Comm'r of Corr., 223 Conn. App. 803 (Conn. App. Ct. 2024). · cites it 2× “it did not abuse its discretion in concluding that such a judgment was warranted’’ because petitioner failed to provide any appropriate explanation for his failure to comply with pleading requirements under General Statutes § 52-110). 22 ‘‘[T]he doctrine of res judicata in the…”

Tianti ex rel. Wright v. Multi Bus. Comput., Inc., 599 A.2d 1073 (Conn. App. Ct. 1991). · cites it 2× “” General Statutes § 52-110 is identical to Practice Book § 102.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.