Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-341 (2026)
Attachment of debt evidenced by negotiable note
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
When a debt evidenced by a negotiable promissory note has been attached by process of foreign attachment and the defendant has had actual notice thereof, he shall not negotiate or transfer such note during the continuance of the attachment lien; and, if he does so, he shall be guilty of fraud upon the attaching creditor, who, if he recovers judgment in his original suit, may, within one year after its rendition, institute a civil action against the defendant for such fraud; but the title of any bona fide purchaser of such note for valuable consideration, without notice and before maturity, shall not be affected by the provisions of this section.
(1949 Rev., S. 8086.)
Cited. 3 C. 29. Transfer held ineffectual to vacate attachment lien. 21 C. 411. Interpleader by garnishee against holder of note and attaching creditor. 74 C. 234.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2020–2020 · leading case: Castle v. DiMugno, 199 Conn. App. 734 (Conn. App. Ct. 2020).
Castle v. DiMugno, 199 Conn. App. 734 (Conn. App. Ct. 2020). “But see General Statutes § 52-341 (‘‘[w]hen a debt evidenced by a negotiable promissory note has been attached by process of foreign attachment and the defendant has had actual notice thereof, he shall not negotiate or transfer such note during the continuance of the attachment…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.