Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-406 (2026)

Submission of agreed case

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Parties to a question in difference which might be the subject of a civil action between them may, without action, agree upon a case containing the facts upon which the controversy depends and submit the case to any court in the judicial district in which either of them resides, in which an action might have been brought to determine the controversy. If it appears by affidavit of the parties, or their respective attorneys, that the controversy is real and the proceeding is submitted in good faith to determine the rights of the parties, the court shall, on payment of the court and clerk fees, as on trial, hear and determine the case and render judgment thereon. The judgment shall be entered as in other cases, but without including costs, and may be enforced in the same manner as if it had been rendered in an action.

(1949 Rev., S. 8149; P.A. 78-280, S. 2, 127; P.A. 82-160, S. 147.)

History: P.A. 78-280 substituted “judicial district” for “county”; P.A. 82-160 rephrased the section.

See Sec. 52-254 re equal sharing of costs in amicable suit.

Provisions of statute must be strictly followed. 68 C. 214. Questionable whether certain differences fall within operation of statute. Id., 332. Cited. 171 C. 463; 175 C. 586; 180 C. 474.

Cited. 17 CS 235.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1976–2016 · leading case: LaFrance v. Lodmell, 144 A.3d 373 (Conn. 2016).
LaFrance v. Lodmell, 144 A.3d 373 (Conn. 2016). · cites it 2× “Specifically, General Statutes § 52-408 provides in relevant part: "[A]n agreement in writing between two or more persons to submit to arbitration any controversy existing between them at the time of the agreement to submit, or an agreement in writing between the parties to a…”
Hopkins v. Pac, 429 A.2d 952 (Conn. 1980). · cites it 2× “The present action comes to the Supreme Court upon a reservation of facts and a question of law pursuant to General Statutes § 52-406. The parties agree upon the facts on which the controversy depends and submit the following question for our advice: Whether the Indian Affairs…”
Roy v. Centennial Ins., 370 A.2d 1011 (Conn. 1976). “Pursuant to the provisions of chapter 908 of the General Statutes (§§ 52-406, 52-407), the parties submitted an agreed case to the Superior Court to determine whether the plaintiff is entitled to recover under the “uninsured motorist” provisions of an automobile liability policy…”
Stolberg v. Caldwell, 402 A.2d 763 (Conn. 1978). “These cases were consolidated and come to the Supreme Court upon a reservation of facts and questions of law pursuant to § 52-406 of the General Statutes as an agreed case in which the parties agree upon the facts on which the controversy depends and submit the same to this…”
LaFrance v. Lodmell (Conn. 2016). · cites it 2× “Specifically, General Statutes § 52-408 provides in rele- vant part: ‘‘[A]n agreement in writing between two or more persons to submit to arbitration any controversy existing between them at the time of the agreement to submit, or an agreement in writing between the parties to a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.