Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 52 — CIVIL ACTIONS · Chapter 909 — Arbitration Proceedings
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-423 (2026)

Appeal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
An appeal may be taken from an order confirming, vacating, modifying or correcting an award, or from a judgment or decree upon an award, as in ordinary civil actions.

(1949 Rev., S. 8166.)

Cited. 197 C. 26; 200 C. 91; Id., 376; 201 C. 50; 206 C. 113; 208 C. 352; 223 C. 761. Defendant may not appeal trial court's order to remand case to arbitration panel because court did not vacate award and hence order does not constitute appealable final judgment under section, nor does order meet Curcio test for appeal of an interlocutory order. 271 C. 474.

Section has been recognized as authoritative source of law concerning appellate jurisdiction to consider the merits of arbitration appeals. 66 CA 202. In appeal arising in the context of a municipal collective bargaining agreement, trial court's order vacating arbitration award and remanding matter for rehearing is an appealable final judgment under section. 224 CA 237.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1985–2025 · leading case: Blondeau v. Baltierra, 252 A.3d 317 (Conn. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Blondeau v. Baltierra, 252 A.3d 317 (Conn. 2020). · cites it 12× “The plaintiff claims that there is no final judgment from which to appeal because General Statutes § 52-423,5 which provides a statutory right of appeal from an order vacating an arbitration award, is inapplicable to arbitra- tion awards that include ‘‘issues related to child…”
Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Ins. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's & Companies Collective, 857 A.2d 893 (Conn. 2004). · cites it 10× “In addition, Hartford Steam Boiler claims that we have subject matter jurisdiction to review the merits of this case pursuant to General Statutes § 52-423 6 because the trial court, in relying on § 52-418 (b), “necessarily vacated the underlying award, in the course of directing…”
Torrington v. Council 4, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Local 442, 224 Conn. App. 237 (Conn. App. Ct. 2024). · cites it 13× “; see General Statutes § 52-423. In Board of Education v.”
Bd. of Educ. of East Haven V. East Haven Educ. Ass'n, 784 A.2d 958 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001). · cites it 5× “The board argues, however, that Curdo’s common-law rule is superseded in this case by General Statutes § 52-423, 11 which establishes a statutoiy right *209 of appeal “from an order confirming, vacating, modifying or correcting an award, or from a judgment or decree upon an…”
Off. of Labor Relations v. New England Health Care Employees Union, Dist. 1199, 951 A.2d 1249 (Conn. 2008). · cites it 4× “Pursuant to General Statutes § 52-423, 4 the plaintiff appealed from the trial court’s judgment to the Appellate Court, and we thereafter transferred the appeal to this court pursuant to General Statutes § 51-199 (c) and Practice Book § 65-1.”
Town of Bloomfield v. United Elec., Radio & Mach. Workers of Am., 939 A.2d 561 (Conn. 2008). · cites it 2× “[6] each notice and other paper used upon an application to confirm, modify or correct the award, and [7] a copy of each order of the court upon such an application”); General Statutes § 52-421 (b) (“[t]he judgment or decree confirming, modifying or correcting an award shall be…”
Bennett v. Meader, 545 A.2d 553 (Conn. 1988). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 52-423. Thus, it is evident that the legislature’s purpose in enacting the statutory scheme was to displace many common law rules.”
East Texas Salt Water Disposal Co. v. Werline, 307 S.W.3d 267 (Tex. 2010). “§ 9:4215 ("An appeal may be taken from an order confirming, modifying, correcting, or vacating an award, or from a judgment entered upon an award, as from an order or judgment in an action.”); N.H.Rev.”
Kolenberg v. Bd. of Educ., 536 A.2d 577 (Conn. 1988). · cites it 2× “Under General Statutes § 52-421, judgment may be entered upon the award, rendering it enforceable as if it had been rendered in a civil action.”
Sch. Administrators Ass'n v. Dow, 511 A.2d 1012 (Conn. 1986). · cites it 2× “By statute, the agreement is enforceable; General Statutes § 52-408; and one party may compel the other to proceed with arbitration by petitioning the *381 Superior Court pursuant to General Statutes § 52-410.”
Success Centers, Inc. v. Huntington Learning Centers, Inc., 613 A.2d 1320 (Conn. 1992). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 52-423. 15 In Schwarzschild v.”
City of Milford v. Local 1566, 510 A.2d 177 (Conn. 1986). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 52-423 provides that “[a]n appeal may be taken from an order confirming, vacating, modifying or correcting an award, or from *96 judgment or decree upon an award, as in ordinary civil actions.” In all civil actions a requisite element of appealability is that…”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.