Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 52 — CIVIL ACTIONS · Chapter 911 — Paternity Proceedings
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-435a (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Transferred to Chapter 815y, Sec. 46b-160.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Secs. 52-435b and 52-435c. Transferred to Chapter 815y, Secs. 46b-165 and 46b-166, respectively.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases, 1966–1980 · leading case: Remkiewicz v. Remkiewicz, 429 A.2d 833 (Conn. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Remkiewicz v. Remkiewicz, 429 A.2d 833 (Conn. 1980). · cites it 2× “The defendant was not Jennifer’s parent because he was not her biological father, he was not her father by adoption, nor was he adjudged to be her father by a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas 4 in a paternity proceeding brought under General Statutes § 52-435a (now §…”
Collins v. Scholz, 373 A.2d 200 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1976). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 52-435a; 2 Stephenson, Conn.”
Gelinas v. Nelson, 327 A.2d 565 (Conn. 1973). · cites it 6× “The next claim of error is that the bastardy statutes, General Statutes §§ 52-435a—52-445, are unconstitutional because they arbitrarily distinguish the father of an illegitimate child both from the mother of an illegitimate child and from the father of a legitimate child,…”
Faraday v. Dube, 399 A.2d 1262 (Conn. 1978). · cites it 2× “The sole issue raised on this appeal is whether, in a paternity action under General Statutes § 52-435a, 1 a person adjudged the father of a child may he held liable, under General Statutes § 52-442, 2 for the support of the mother while she is caring for the child.”
Perkins v. Perkins, 383 A.2d 634 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1977). · cites it 2× “” Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. Prince, 28 Conn. Sup.”
Doe v. Maher, 414 F. Supp. 1368 (D. Conn. 1976). · cites it 2× “the basic statute pursuant to which the previous proceedings were instituted was enacted as § 52-435a in chapter 911 entitled "Paternity Proceedings.”
Robertson v. Apuzzo, 365 A.2d 824 (Conn. 1976). “” No longer is there any reference in that section to quasi-criminal procedures such as arrest, pleas of guilty or not guilty, hearing on probable eause or binding over for trial. A plaintiff’s paternity action has been stripped of any quasi-criminal characteristics and clearly…”
Doe v. Norton, 365 F. Supp. 65 (D. Conn. 1973). · cites it 2× “A strong case would be presented if the father's identity is ascertainable and the three-year statute of limitations for paternity actions, § 52-435a, has not run. On the other hand, there may well be situations where the prospect of enforcing the father's support obligation is…”
Kuser v. Orkis, 362 A.2d 943 (Conn. 1975). “406, § 8, and what is now § 52-435a substituted for it. This statute omits any authorization for the arrest of the putative father and now provides that paternity proceedings shall be initiated upon the verified petition of the mother filed in the Court of Common Pleas which…”
State v. Wolfe, 239 A.2d 509 (Conn. 1968). “Significantly, although § 52-442b expressly requires that a “written acknowledgement” and support agreement which is executed “in lieu of or in conclusion of [paternity] proceedings under section 52-435a” shall be sworn to, in this support statute the legislature made no…”
Coveney v. Nicoletti, 362 A.2d 937 (Conn. 1975). · cites it 2× “The hearing was conducted pursuant to the provision of § 52-435a of the General Statutes that if a putative father fails to appear in court at the time and plaee prescribed in the court’s summons “the court may hear the petitioner and enter such judgment and order as the facts…”
Fulmore v. Deveaux, 220 A.2d 462 (Conn. App. Ct. 1966). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 52-435a. 4 The record in the case before us discloses that on July 22, 1965, the plaintiff, a married woman who had lived apart from her husband since 1962, instituted proceedings by verified petition in the Circuit Court to establish the paternity of a female…”
Show all 21 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.