Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 54 — CRIMINAL PROCEDURE · Chapter 960 — Information, Procedure and Bail
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-76 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Transferred to Chapter 886, Sec. 51-286c.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1979–2011 · leading case: State v. BB, 17 A.3d 30 (Conn. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. BB, 17 A.3d 30 (Conn. 2011). · cites it 4× “Finally, the records and proceedings of a defendant on the youthful offender docket are kept confidential and are erased when the youthful offender attains twenty-one years of age, provided he has not been convicted of a felony subsequent to being adjudicated a youthful offender.”
State v. Bell, 425 A.2d 574 (Conn. 1979). · cites it 2× “If error is found and youthful offender status is granted, all records will be sealed and the information or complaint becomes a nullity.”
State v. Phillips, 927 A.2d 931 (Conn. App. Ct. 2007). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 54-76f. A youthful offender's records are confidential with the exception of certain permitted disclosures.”
Penfield v. Venuti, 589 F. Supp. 250 (D. Conn. 1984). · cites it 2× “§ 54-142a, but the dissimilar erasure provisions of the youthful offender statute, Conn.Gen.Stat. § 54-76/. The case therefore supports plaintiff’s position only by rough analogy at best.”
State v. R. W., 984 A.2d 1177 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2009). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 54-76k. Moreover, a youthful offender is not considered a criminal, and a determination that a defendant is a youthful offender is not deemed a conviction.”
State v. RW, 984 A.2d 1177 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2009). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 54-76k. Moreover, a youthful offender is not considered a criminal, and a determination that a defendant is a youthful offender is not deemed a conviction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.