(a) In any case where an information or complaint has been laid charging a defendant with the commission of a crime, and where it appears that the defendant is a youth, such defendant shall be presumed to be eligible to be adjudged a youthful offender and the court having jurisdiction shall, but only as to the public, order the court file sealed, unless such defendant (1) is charged with the commission of a crime which is a class A felony or a violation of section
53a-70b of the general statutes, revision of 1958, revised to January 1, 2019, or section
14-222a, subsection (a) or subdivision (1) of subsection (b) of section
14-224, section
14-227a,
14-227g or
14-227m, subdivision (1) or (2) of subsection (a) of section
14-227n, subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section
53-21 or section
53a-70,
53a-70a,
53a-71,
53a-72a or
53a-72b, except a violation involving consensual sexual intercourse or sexual contact between the youth and another person who is thirteen years of age or older but under sixteen years of age, or (2) has been previously convicted of a felony in the regular criminal docket of the Superior Court or been previously adjudged a serious juvenile offender or serious juvenile repeat offender, as defined in section
46b-120. Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, upon motion of the prosecuting official, the court may order that an investigation be made of such defendant under section
54-76d, for the purpose of determining whether such defendant is ineligible to be adjudged a youthful offender, provided the court file shall remain sealed, but only as to the public, during such investigation.
(b) (1) Upon motion of the prosecuting official and order of the court, the case of any defendant who is a youth and is charged with the commission of a felony, other than a felony set forth in subsection (a) of this section, shall be transferred from the youthful offender docket to the regular criminal docket of the Superior Court, provided the court finds that there is probable cause to believe the defendant has committed the act for which he or she is charged. The defendant shall be arraigned in the regular criminal docket of the Superior Court by the next court business day following such transfer, provided any proceedings held prior to the finalization of such transfer shall be private and shall be conducted in such parts of the courthouse or the building wherein court is located as shall be separate and apart from the other parts of the court which are then being held for proceedings pertaining to adults charged with crimes. The file of any case so transferred shall remain sealed until the end of the tenth working day following such arraignment, unless the prosecuting official has filed a motion pursuant to subdivision (2) of this subsection, in which case such file shall remain sealed until the court makes a decision on the motion.
(2) A prosecuting official may, not later than ten working days after such arraignment, file a motion to transfer the case of any defendant who is a youth and is charged with the commission of a felony, other than a felony set forth in subsection (a) of this section, from the regular criminal docket of the Superior Court to the youthful offender docket for proceedings in accordance with the provisions of sections 54-76b to 54-76n, inclusive. The court sitting for the regular criminal docket of the Superior Court shall, after hearing and not later than ten working days after the filing of such motion, decide such motion.
(1971, P.A. 72, S. 2; P.A. 98-81, S. 9; P.A. 05-232, S. 2; P.A. 08-32, S. 11; P.A. 14-130, S. 36; P.A. 16-126, S. 34; P.A. 19-189, S. 27.)
History: P.A. 98-81 changed “information or complaint” to “court file”; P.A. 05-232 designated existing provisions as Subsec. (a) and amended same by replacing provisions re investigation of defendant for purpose of determining eligibility to be adjudged a youthful offender with provisions re presumption of eligibility, exceptions to eligibility and investigation to determine ineligibility to be adjudged a youthful offender, and added Subsec. (b) re transfer of cases, effective January 1, 2006; P.A. 08-32 amended Subsec. (a)(1) to add violations of Sec. 14-222a, 14-224(a), 14-227a and 14-227g to list of violations to which presumption of eligibility and sealing of the court file does not apply, effective August 1, 2008; P.A. 14-130 amended Subsec. (a)(1) by adding reference to Sec. 14-224(b)(1); P.A. 16-126 amended Subsec. (a) by adding references to Secs. 14-227m and 14-227n(a)(1) and (2); P.A. 19-189 amended Subsec. (a)(1) by replacing “53a-70b,” with “section 53a-70b of the general statutes, revision of 1958, revised to January 1, 2019, or”.
Cited. 173 C. 414; 179 C. 98; 188 C. 565; 192 C. 85. Trial court order transferring defendant's case from youthful offender docket to regular criminal docket is not an appealable interlocutory order under 191 C. 27 because it does not conclude the rights of defendant regarding his status as a youthful offender. 300 C. 764.
Cited. 8 CA 607.
Cited. 30 CS 71. Because statutory benefits afforded to defendant under section constitute a liberty interest in youthful offender status and the discretionary transfer of a youthful offender docket to regular criminal docket vests such liberty interest in eligible defendants, due process requires notice and hearing for court to determine independently whether such transfer is appropriate. 51 CS 342.
Subsec. (b):
Subdiv. (1) does not require notice and a hearing before a case may be transferred from youthful offender docket to regular criminal docket, but Subsec. implicitly requires notice and a hearing by the court on regular criminal docket prior to finalization of a transfer of a case from youthful offender docket. 300 C. 748.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
21
cases, 1979–2020 · leading case:
State v. BB, 17 A.3d 30 (Conn. 2011).
State v. BB, 17 A.3d 30 (Conn. 2011).
· cites it 45× “, appeals [1] from the decision of the trial court, which granted the state's motion to transfer the defendant's case from the youthful offender docket to the regular criminal docket, pursuant to General Statutes § 54-76c (b)(1). [2] The defendant contends that the trial court…”
State v. B.B, 300 Conn. 748 (Conn. 2011).
· cites it 42× “, appeals 1 from the decision of the trial court, which granted the state’s *750 motion to transfer the defendant’s case from the youthful offender docket to the regular criminal docket, pursuant to General Statutes § 54-76c (b) (l). 2 The defendant contends that the trial court…”
State v. JAMAR D., 18 A.3d 582 (Conn. 2011).
· cites it 22× “, from an order of the trial court transferring the defendant’s case from the youthful offender docket of the Superior Court (youthful offender docket) to the regular criminal docket of the Superior Court (regular criminal docket) pursuant to General Statutes § 54-76c (b) (l). 2…”
Doe v. Connecticut Bar Examining Comm., 818 A.2d 14 (Conn. 2003).
· cites it 3× “of any children involved or the nature of the case so requires”); General Statutes § 46b-49 (permitting closed hearings in divorce, separation and annulment proceedings when “in the interests of justice and the persons involved”); General Statutes § 46b-122 (exclusion from…”
Vargas v. Doe, 900 A.2d 525 (Conn. App. Ct. 2006).
· cites it 3× “eparation and annulment proceedings when “in the interests of justice and the persons involved”); General Statutes § 46b-122 (exclusion from courtroom in juvenile matters of “any person whose presence is, in the court’s opinion, not necessary”); General Statutes § 46b-142…”
State v. Phillips, 927 A.2d 931 (Conn. App. Ct. 2007).
· cites it 4× “General Statutes § 54-76c. Statements, admissions or confessions made during youthful offender proceedings are inadmissible as evidence against the youth in subsequent proceedings except with respect to sentencing in certain situations.”
Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp., 970 A.2d 656 (Conn. 2009).
· cites it 2× “, General Statutes § 46b-49 (private hearings in family-related matters permitted when “in the interests of justice and the persons involved”); General Statutes § 54-76c (court files sealed from public access in certain criminal prosecutions of youthful offenders); General…”
State v. Eric T., 513 A.2d 1273 (Conn. App. Ct. 1986).
· cites it 5× “He was arraigned on the same day on both informations and moved for youthful offender status pursuant to General Statutes § 54-76c. Both motions were granted by the court after an investigation as to his eligibility.”
State v. Bell, 425 A.2d 574 (Conn. 1979).
· cites it 2× “NOTES [1] In his motion made pursuant to § 54-76c of the General Statutes, the defendant represented that on the date of the alleged offense he had reached the age of sixteen but had not reached the age of eighteen years, that the crime charged was not a class A felony, and that…”
Robinson v. Comm'r of Corr., 771 A.2d 952 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001).
· cites it 3× “The petitioner claims, inter alia, that Kelly failed to advise him properly with respect to the meaning and effect of his Alford plea, failed to apply on his behalf for youthful offender status pursuant to § 54-76c, failed to move for an adult adjudication certification hearing…”
State v. R. W., 984 A.2d 1177 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2009).
· cites it 30× “In this case of first impression, the court is obliged to resolve whether the transfer of the defendant’s case under General Statutes § 54-76c from the docket for youthful offender matters to the regular criminal docket of the Superior Court requires the court to exercise its…”
State v. Longo, 469 A.2d 1220 (Conn. 1984).
“All of the proceedings except proceedings on the motion under section 54-76c had under the provisions of sections 54-76b to 54-76n, inclusive, shall be private and shall be conducted in such parts of the courthouse or the building wherein court is *91 located as shall be…”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-76c(a) — 1 case
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-76c(b) — 2 cases
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-76c(b)(1) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.