Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 54 — CRIMINAL PROCEDURE · Chapter 960a — Youthful Offenders
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-76p (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Transferred to Chapter 960, Sec. 54-56e.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1979–2014 · leading case: State v. Lavorgna, 437 A.2d 131 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Lavorgna, 437 A.2d 131 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1981). · cites it 9× “IV The final claim of the defendant is that his application for a program of accelerated rehabilitation under *778 General Statutes § 54-76p 9 in relation to the charge of operating while under the influence in violation of § 14-227a was denied (Higgins, J.”
Jerome Singleton v. City of New York, Ronald Salzer & Anthony Dellaventura, 632 F.2d 185 (2d Cir. 1980). “1978) (rehabilitation program required); Conn. Gen.Stat.Ann. § 54-76p (West Supp.1979) (same); Wash.”
AFSCME, Council 4, Local 1565 v. Dep't of Corr., 6 A.3d 1142 (Conn. 2010). · cites it 2× “” 8 The statute originally was codified at General Statutes § 54-76p, and, in 1981, the provision was transferred to § 54-56e.”
State v. Kluttz, 521 A.2d 178 (Conn. App. Ct. 1987). “to 1979) § 54-76p only to “persons accused of a crime, not of a serious nature.”
Konon v. Fornal, 612 F. Supp. 68 (D. Conn. 1985). “Following his arrest, Andrew Konon was placed in a jail cell for a short time prior to his release on bond. 3. In response to said charges, Andrew Konon applied for, and was granted, accelerated rehabilitation, pursuant to Conn.”
State v. Whitney, 440 A.2d 987 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1981). “2d 574 (1979), the irreversible effect of publicity upon an applicant for youthful offender treatment under General Statutes § 54-76b to § 54-76p (now § 54-56e), who would have been entitled to a private hearing and sealed records if his application was granted, was held to make…”
State v. Anonymous (1980-5), 36 Conn. Supp. 527 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1979). · cites it 7× “He has appealed from that judgment, claiming error in the denial, for lack of jurisdiction, of his motion for pretrial accelerated rehabilitation under General Statutes § 54-76p. 1 The record indicates that the trial court denied the defendant’s motion upon the ground that the…”
State v. Kevalis, 313 Conn. 590 (Conn. 2014). “to 1975) § 54-76p. In 1981, the statute was transferred to § 54-56e.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.