Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 07 — MUNICIPALITIES · Chapter 97a — Historic Districts and Historic Properties
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-147h (2026)

Action by commission to prevent illegal acts

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) If any provision of this part or any action taken or ruling made by the historic district commission pursuant to the provisions of said sections or of any regulation or ordinance adopted under said sections has been violated, the commission may, in addition to other remedies, institute an action in the superior court for the judicial district wherein such violation exists, which court shall have jurisdiction to restrain such violation and to issue orders directing that the violation be corrected or removed. Such order may direct the removal of any building, structure or exterior architectural feature erected in violation of said sections or any bylaw or ordinance adopted under said sections or the substantial restoration of any building, structure, or exterior architectural feature altered or demolished in violation of said sections or any regulation or ordinance adopted under said sections. Regulations and orders of the commission issued pursuant to said sections, or to any regulation or ordinance adopted under said sections, shall be enforced by the zoning enforcement official or building inspector or by such other person as may be designated by ordinance, who may be authorized to inspect and examine any building, structure, place or premises and to require in writing the remedying of any condition found to exist therein or thereon in violation of any provision of the regulations or orders made under the authority of said sections or of any regulation or ordinance adopted under said sections.

(b) The owner or agent of any building, structure or place where a violation of any provision of this part or of any regulation or ordinance adopted under said sections has been committed or exists, or the lessee or tenant of an entire building, entire structure or place where such violation has been committed or exists, or the owner, agent, lessee or tenant of any part of the building, structure or place in which such violation has been committed or exists, or the agent, architect, builder, contractor, or any other person who commits, takes part or assists in any such violation or who maintains any building, structure or place in which any such violation exists, shall be fined not less than ten dollars nor more than one hundred dollars for each day that such violation continues; but, if the offense is wilful, the person convicted thereof shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars nor more than two hundred fifty dollars for each day that such violation continues. The superior court for the judicial district wherein such violation continues or exists shall have jurisdiction of all such offenses, subject to appeal as in other cases. Each day that a violation continues to exist shall constitute a separate offense. All costs, fees and expenses in connection with actions under this section may, in the discretion of the court, be assessed as damages against the violator, which, together with reasonable attorney's fees, may be awarded to the historic district commission which brought such action. Any funds collected as fines pursuant to this section shall be used by the commission to restore the affected buildings, structures, or places to their condition prior to the violation wherever possible and any excess shall be paid to the municipality in which the district is situated.

(1961, P.A. 430, S. 10; P.A. 73-473, S. 4; P.A. 74-183, S. 166, 291; P.A. 76-436, S. 145, 681; P.A. 78-280, S. 1, 127; P.A. 80-314, S. 8.)

History: P.A. 73-473 included reference to parking; P.A. 74-183 substituted court of common pleas for circuit court and included reference to “county or judicial district”; P.A. 76-436 substituted superior court for court of common pleas, effective July 1, 1978; P.A. 78-280 deleted reference to “county”; P.A. 80-314 divided section into Subsecs. (a) and (b), replaced former provisions for proceedings to prevent unlawful acts with provisions for proceedings in superior court and added provisions concerning court costs, attorneys' fees and fines.

Cited. 153 C. 160; 171 C. 199; 189 C. 727; 196 C. 596.

Provision authorizing imposition of fines is directory rather than mandatory and the trial court's decision to refrain from imposing fines did not preclude it from awarding attorney's fees to commission; court's order to comply, standing alone, without affirmatively labeling defendant as a violator, is sufficient to implicate the court's authority under section to award attorney's fees to commission for its successful enforcement action; court may award attorney's fees, costs and expenses related to defense of a counterclaim under section. 152 CA 161.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1985–2014 · leading case: Gentry v. City of Norwalk, 494 A.2d 1206 (Conn. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gentry v. City of Norwalk, 494 A.2d 1206 (Conn. 1985). · cites it 2× “” General Statutes § 7-147a (b). The statute, consistent with its historic preservation purpose, provides the bases for close control and supervision of the buildings and areas in established historic districts.”
Historic Dist. Comm'n v. Sciame, 58 A.3d 354 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013). · cites it 5× “The commission sought a judgment to enforce the condition, to assess fines, and to recover costs and fees under General Statutes § 7-147h. 3 *213 On January 13,2011, the defendants filed an amended answer, special defenses and a two count counterclaim.”
Historic Dist. Comm'n v. Sciame, 99 A.3d 207 (Conn. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 32× “87 in attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) awarded attorney’s fees without making a finding that the defen- dants had violated General Statutes § 7-147h, and (2) awarded attorney’s fees related to the defense of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.