Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 08 — · Chapter 124 — Zoning
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-3h (2026)

Notice to adjoining municipalities

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 8-3h is repealed, effective October 1, 2003.

(P.A. 87-307, S. 1; P.A. 89-175, S. 3, 7; P.A. 03-177, S. 14.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1991–2020 · leading case: Lauer v. Zoning Comm'n, 600 A.2d 310 (Conn. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lauer v. Zoning Comm'n, 600 A.2d 310 (Conn. 1991). · cites it 41× “I The plaintiff first claims that the failure to give notice to the town of Bethel as required by General Statutes § 8-3h deprived the commission of subject matter jurisdiction over the special permit application.”
Town of North Haven v. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 600 A.2d 1004 (Conn. 1991). · cites it 45× “The dispositive issue of this appeal is whether proposed amendments to the Hamden zoning regulations considered by the named defendant, the Hamden planning and zoning commission (commission), “concern[ed] [a] project” within the meaning of General Statutes § 8-3h 1 so that the…”
City of Torrington v. Zoning Comm'n, 806 A.2d 1020 (Conn. 2002). · cites it 6× “Having received the required statutory notice of the application pursuant to General Statutes § 8-3h, 5 the Torrington commission notified the Harwin *766 ton commission that it was now opposed to any access to the project from any Torrington street.”
Delfino v. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 620 A.2d 836 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993). · cites it 10× “The four alternate grounds are (1) the failure of the commission to file a copy of the proposed zone change map with the city clerk’s office no later than ten days before the public hearing, as required by General Statutes § 8-3 (a),* * 3 (2) the failure of the commission to…”
City of Torrington v. Zoning Comm'n of Harwinton, 778 A.2d 1027 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001). · cites it 4× “Because the proposed development was located within five hundred feet of the Torrington city line, *783 the commission, pursuant to General Statutes § 8-3h, 4 notified the Torrington town clerk of the pendency of Saglimbeni’s application.”
Mayer v. Historic Dist. Comm'n of Groton, 160 A.3d 333 (Conn. 2017). “to 1989] § 8-3h was subject matter jurisdictional defect); Jarvis Acres, Inc.”
Lime Rock Park, LLC v. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n (Conn. 2020). · cites it 3× “This court concluded that the failure to give notice pursuant to § 8-3h did not implicate the commission’s subject matter jurisdiction but merely provided for ‘‘personal notice.’’ Id., 464–65. This court further concluded that the plaintiff had no standing to raise the claim on…”
Lime Rock Park, LLC v. Plan. & Zoning Comm'n, 335 Conn. 606 (Conn. 2020). · cites it 3× “This court concluded that the failure to give notice pursuant to § 8-3h did not implicate the commission’s subject matter jurisdiction but merely provided for ‘‘personal notice.’’ Id., 464–65. This court further concluded that the plaintiff had no standing to raise the claim on…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.