Delaware Code
10 Del. C. § 350 (2026)
Voluntary final adjudications before a Magistrate in Chancery
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
DE-DELCdelcode.delaware.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The parties in any matter may stipulate to a final adjudication of the matter by a Magistrate of the Court of Chancery. In such a stipulation, the parties shall consent that the decision of the Magistrate shall have the same effect as a decision of a member of the Court of Chancery. Appeals from decisions of the Magistrate in a matter governed by such a stipulation shall be determined in all respects by the same procedural and substantive standards as are applicable to appeals from decisions of members of the Court of Chancery.
77 Del. Laws, c. 8, § 1; 84 Del. Laws, c. 101, § 3;Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (14 in the last 5 years), 2024–2026 · leading case: Appleby Apts. LP v. Appleby Apts. Assocs., L.P. (Del. 2024).
Appleby Apts. LP v. Appleby Apts. Assocs., L.P. (Del. 2024). “10 Del. C. § 350 (“The parties in any matter may stipulate to a final adjudication of the matter by a Magistrate of the Court of Chancery.”
Timothy James O'Neil-Dunne v. Phoenicia LLC (Del. Ch. 2024). “The parties therefore have stipulated to submit the dispute to me for a final adjudication pursuant to 10 Del. C. § 350 1 via cross-motions 1 See Order Regarding Cross-Mots.”
Theerachanon v. FIA Cards Servs. (Del. 2024). “(4) In the absence of a stipulation by the parties to submit their dispute to a Magistrate for final decision under 10 Del. C. § 350 or an order by the Court of Chancery adopting the Magistrate’s final report under Court of Chancery Rule 144(c), this Court lacks jurisdiction to…”
Talley v. Horn (Del. 2024). “(4) In the absence of a stipulation by the parties to submit their dispute to a Magistrate for final decision under 10 Del. C. § 350 or an order by the Court of Chancery adopting the Magistrate’s final report under Court of Chancery Rule 144(c), this Court lacks jurisdiction to…”
Burley v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas (Del. 2024). “(4) In the absence of a stipulation by the parties to submit their dispute to a Magistrate for final decision under 10 Del. C. § 350 or an order by the Court of Chancery adopting the Magistrate’s final report under Court of Chancery Rule 144(c), this Court lacks jurisdiction to…”
Barry Leistner v. Red Mud Enter. LLC (Del. Ch. 2024). “2 WHEREAS, any party wishing to challenge a ruling from a Magistrate, absent a stipulation under 10 Del. C. § 350, must do so first through the exceptions process in Court of Chancery Rule 144; under Rule 144(d)(2), notice of exceptions in a summary or expedited proceeding, like…”
Burley v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas (Del. 2024). “(4) In the absence of a stipulation by the parties to submit their dispute to a Magistrate for final decision under 10 Del. C. § 350 or an order by the Court of Chancery adopting the Magistrate’s final report under Court of Chancery Rule 144(c), this Court lacks jurisdiction to…”
Dr. Guy Kezirian v. World Coll. of Refractice Surgery & Visual Sciences PBC (Del. Ch. 2026). “This is a letter decision, issued under 10 Del. C. § 350 and Court of Chancery Rule 144(g), through which the parties agreed to submit this action to me for a final decision.”
Paul A. Rhodes, Ph.D. v. bioMérieux, Inc. (Del. Ch. 2024). “”); see also 10 Del. C. § 350 (“The parties in any matter may stipulate to a final adjudication of the matter by a Magistrate of the Court of Chancery.”
Theerachanon v. FIA Cards Servs. (Del. 2024). “1 In the absence of a stipulation by the parties to submit their dispute to a Magistrate for a final decision under 10 Del. C. § 350 or an order by the Court of Chancery 1 Theerachanon v.”
In the Matter of Rolf D. Brewster, a person with a disability (Del. 2025). “May 8, 2024) (“In the absence of a stipulation by the parties to submit their dispute to a Magistrate for final decision under 10 Del. C. § 350 or an order by the Court of Chancery adopting the Magistrate’s final report under Court of Chancery Rule 144(c), this Court lacks…”
Justin Cornett v. Collectable Sports Assets, LLC (Del. Ch. 2025). “On February 4, 2025, through their proposed schedule, the parties stipulated to my making a final decision under Court of Chancery Rule 144(g) and 10 Del. C. § 350, waiving any trial-level review C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.