Delaware Code

10 Del. C. § 5701 (2026)

Effect of arbitration agreement

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section DE-DELCdelcode.delaware.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A written agreement to submit to arbitration any controversy existing at or arising after the effective date of the agreement is valid, enforceable and irrevocable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract, without regard to the justiciable character of the controversy, and confers jurisdiction on the Chancery Court of the State to enforce it and to enter judgment on an award. In determining any matter arising under this chapter, the Court shall not consider whether the claim with respect to which arbitration is sought is tenable, or otherwise pass upon the merits of the dispute. This chapter also applies to arbitration agreements between employers and employees or between their respective representatives, except as otherwise provided in § 5725 of this title.

10 Del. C. 1953, §  5701;  58 Del. Laws, c. 382, §  2
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: Wojdak v. Greater Philadelphia Cablevision, Inc., 707 A.2d 214 (Pa. 1998).
Wojdak v. Greater Philadelphia Cablevision, Inc., 707 A.2d 214 (Pa. 1998). · cites it 2× “The limited partners asserted that the valuation had been procured by “undue means” in violation of the Delaware Uniform Arbitration Act, 10 Del.Code §§ 5701 et seq., because Waller had consulted with undisclosed cable television inves *483 tors in gathering information…”
Ex Parte Alabama Oxygen Co., Inc., 433 So. 2d 1158 (Ala. 1983). “10 §§ 101, et seq. (1975); Ind.Code §§ 34-4-2-1, et seq.”
Ne. Fin. Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North Am., 757 F. Supp. 381 (D. Del. 1991). “Motion to Vacate As Plaintiffs' insurance contract was entered into after 1972, Delaware’s Uniform Arbitration Act, 10 Del.C. § 5701, et seq., applies to Plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the *385 appraisal award.”
EMSI Acquisition, Inc. v. Contrarian Funds, LLC (Del. Ch. 2017). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff has Failed to Plead a Claim for Confirmation of the Auditor’s Award In the second count of the Complaint, Plaintiff seeks confirmation of the findings of the Settlement Auditor pursuant to 10 Del. C. §§ 5701 and 5713, and the entry of judgment for the amount of the…”
F.N.B. Corp. v. Mariner Royal Holdings, LLC (D. Del. 2020). · cites it 2× “That said, having reviewed the cases cited by the parties, it appears to me that the Court of Chancery has jurisdiction over this dispute pursuant to its authority under 10 Del. C. §§ 5701 and 5702 to enforce arbitration decisions.”
Alexander v. Lyft (Del. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 2× “2 10 Del. C. §5701. 2 of determining whether it has subject matter jurisdiction.”
Essa Abdul-Ahad (Del. Ct. Com. Pl. 2016). “26, 2007); see Cooper, 1992 WL 240419 , at *7 (Del. Super. Sep. 3, 1992) (ho1ding res judicata applicable, in part, due to parties agreeing that arbitration decision would be final).”
City of Wilmington v. GEICO Advantage Ins. Co. (Del. Super. Ct. 2016). “28 See, 10 Del. C. §5701 referring to “[a] written agreement to submit to arbitration.”
Dewey v. Amazon.com, Inc. (Del. Super. Ct. 2019). “'° 10 Del. C. § 5701; Tekmen & Co. v. Southern Builders, Inc.”
Skinner v. Peninsula Healthcare Servs., LLC (Del. Super. Ct. 2021). “On a Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1), the Court must accept every well-pled allegation as true and draw all reasonable inferences in the non-movant’s favor.”
Geraci v. Uber Tech. (Del. Super. Ct. 2021). “4 On a Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1), the Court must accept every well-pled allegation as true and draw all reasonable inferences in the non-movant's favor.”
Reginald Broome v. Am. Fam. Life Assurance (3d Cir. 2021). “Further, to the extent appellants argue that they were in compliance with the Delaware Uniform Arbitration Act (“DUAA”), 10 Del. C. § 5701, as explained, under the Associate’s Agreements, the arbitration proceeding between the parties as well as the right to seek to vacate the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.