Delaware Code

11 Del. C. § 431 (2026)

Duress as affirmative defense; defense unavailable in certain situations

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section DE-DELCdelcode.delaware.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In any prosecution for an offense, it is an affirmative defense that the defendant engaged in the conduct charged to constitute the offense because the defendant was coerced to do so by the use of, or a threat to use, force against the defendant’s person or the person of another, which a reasonable person in the defendant’s situation would have been unable to resist.

(b) The defense provided by subsection (a) of this section is unavailable if the defendant intentionally or recklessly placed himself or herself in a situation in which it was probable that the defendant would be subjected to duress.

(c) It is not a defense that a woman acted on the command of her husband, unless she acted under such coercion as would establish a defense under this section. The presumption that a woman acting in the presence of her husband is coerced is abolished.

11 Del. C. 1953, §  431;  58 Del. Laws, c. 497, §  1;  70 Del. Laws, c. 186, §  1; 
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1975–2019 · leading case: Feliciano v. State, 332 A.2d 148 (Del. 1975).
Feliciano v. State, 332 A.2d 148 (Del. 1975). “Under the Delaware Criminal Code, 11 Del.C. § 431, duress is a defense to criminal liability under certain circumstances, stated as follows: “(a) In any prosecution for an offense, it is an affirmative defense that *149 the defendant engaged in the conduct charged to constitute…”
State v. Stevens (Del. Super. Ct. 2019). “20, 2019) (citing 11 Del. C. § 431(d) (“Probation and parole officers shall exercise the same powers as constables under the laws of this State.”
11 Del. C. § 431(d): 1 case
State v. Stevens (Del. Super. Ct. 2019). “20, 2019) (citing 11 Del. C. § 431(d) (“Probation and parole officers shall exercise the same powers as constables under the laws of this State.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.