Del. C. » Title 11 — Prisons and Prisoners · CHAPTER 65. Department of Correction · Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Delaware Code

11 Del. C. § 6526 (2026)

Special facilities for witnesses and those awaiting trial

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section DE-DELCdelcode.delaware.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Special facilities shall be provided for witnesses detained for inability to give bail and those awaiting trial, as the Department deems fit and necessary.

11 Del. C. 1953, §  6526;  54 Del. Laws, c. 349, §  1;  58 Del. Laws, c. 172, §  1;  64 Del. Laws, c. 108, §  33; 
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1971–1975 · leading case: Campbell v. Anderson, 335 F. Supp. 483 (D. Del. 1971).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Campbell v. Anderson, 335 F. Supp. 483 (D. Del. 1971). · cites it 3× “The complaint, as amended and particularized, alleges that the defendants negligently and/or intentionally incarcerated the defendants in the maximum security section at the Center rather than in the pre-trial building in violation of 11 Del.C. § 6526(b) 2 and as a proximate…”
Bartley v. Holden, 338 A.2d 137 (Del. Super. Ct. 1975). “§ 938, and, if convicted, may be committed to the custody and care of the Department under a criminal sentence for a period of time specified by the Court.”
State ex rel. duPont ex rel. Johnson v. Ingram, 294 A.2d 839 (Del. Super. Ct. 1971). · cites it 2× “This proceeding was initiated upon petitioners’ request for a Writ of Mandamus based upon the language of the then existing 11 Del.C. § 6526(a) which provided : “(a) Appropriate, separate custodial care and work and training facilities shall be provided for youthful offenders by…”
State v. Nicholson, 334 A.2d 230 (Del. Super. Ct. 1975). “(11 Del.C. § 6526(a)). This limitation became effective in 1964 as part of the Act establishing the State Department of Corrections.”
State Ex Rel. duPont v. Ingram, 293 A.2d 289 (Del. 1972). · cites it 3× “HERRMANN, Justice: This is an appeal from the order of the Superior Court vacating its prior mandate that the defendants in this mandamus action “provide appropriate separate work, custody, training and treatment facilities for youthful offenders within the meaning of 11 Del.C.…”
11 Del. C. § 6526(a): 3 cases
State ex rel. duPont ex rel. Johnson v. Ingram, 294 A.2d 839 (Del. Super. Ct. 1971). “This proceeding was initiated upon petitioners’ request for a Writ of Mandamus based upon the language of the then existing 11 Del.C. § 6526(a) which provided : “(a) Appropriate, separate custodial care and work and training facilities shall be provided for youthful offenders by…”
State v. Nicholson, 334 A.2d 230 (Del. Super. Ct. 1975). “(11 Del.C. § 6526(a)). This limitation became effective in 1964 as part of the Act establishing the State Department of Corrections.”
State Ex Rel. duPont v. Ingram, 293 A.2d 289 (Del. 1972). “HERRMANN, Justice: This is an appeal from the order of the Superior Court vacating its prior mandate that the defendants in this mandamus action “provide appropriate separate work, custody, training and treatment facilities for youthful offenders within the meaning of 11 Del.C.…”
11 Del. C. § 6526(b): 1 case
Campbell v. Anderson, 335 F. Supp. 483 (D. Del. 1971). “The complaint, as amended and particularized, alleges that the defendants negligently and/or intentionally incarcerated the defendants in the maximum security section at the Center rather than in the pre-trial building in violation of 11 Del.C. § 6526(b) 2 and as a proximate…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.