Delaware Code

16 Del. C. § 4723 (2026)

Republishing of schedules [Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section DE-DELCdelcode.delaware.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Repealed by 60 Del. Laws, c. 583, § 3, effective July 21, 1976.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1973–1973 · leading case: Holden v. State, 305 A.2d 320 (Del. 1973).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Holden v. State, 305 A.2d 320 (Del. 1973). · cites it 2× “§ 4725; the defendant Griffin and Margaret Staples were convicted of possessing a narcotic drug, in violation of 16 Del.C. § 4723. All except Staples appeal.”

Miller v. State, 310 A.2d 867 (Del. 1973). · cites it 2× “§ 4725, and was convicted of the lesser included offense of possessing a narcotic drug, in violation of 16 Del.C. § 4723. Appellant’s appeal is predicated upon two grounds: (1) the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the heroin seized by the arresting officers; and (2)…”

Dobrosielski v. State, 311 A.2d 875 (Del. 1973). “§ 4725, and possession of marijuana, in violation of 16 Del.C. § 4723. He seeks a reversal of this conviction.”

State v. Bright, 305 A.2d 332 (Del. Super. Ct. 1973). · cites it 2× “Defendants are charged with possession of a narcotic drug in violation of 16 Del. Code § 4723. This is the decision on the suppression hearing.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.