No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Meeks
v.
Mitchell
v.
Mitchell
Unpublished
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7673
JOHN M. MEEKS,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
MARY MITCHELL, Warden FCI Edgefield,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (6:10-cv-01346-RMG)
Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 23, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John M. Meeks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7673
JOHN M. MEEKS,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
MARY MITCHELL, Warden FCI Edgefield,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (6:10-cv-01346-RMG)
Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 23, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John M. Meeks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John M. Meeks, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Meeks v. Mitchell, No. 6:10-cv-01346-RMG (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[*2]