REF v. State, 265 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
REF v. State, 265 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Justice (fladistctapp, 1984-06-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Justice
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See, State v. R.E.F., 251 So.2d 672 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971), affm'd 265 So.2d 701 (Fla.1972).
cited Cited "see" State v. Jones
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See, State v. R.E.F., 251 So.2d 672 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971), affm'd 265 So.2d 701 (Fla. 1972).
discussed Cited "see" Beatrice Tooten v. Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General, State of Florida, and Reubin O'd. Askew, Governor, and the State of Florida, No. 73-3816 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
5th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See R.E.F. v. State, 265 So.2d 701 (Fla.1972) 12 See text accompanying footnote 8, supra 13 410 U.S. 484 , 93 S.Ct. 1123 , 35 L.Ed.2d 443 (1973) 14 Braden v. Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky, 410 U.S. 484 , 93 S.Ct. 1123 , 35 L.Ed.2d 443, 449 (1973) 15 See note 3, supra 16 In his dissent in Braden v. Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky, 410 U.S. 484, 508 , 93 S.Ct. 1123, 1136 , 35 L.Ed.2d 443, 456 (1973), Justice Rehnquist states that the situations in which pretrial habeas 'is jusitified involve the lack of jurisdiction, under the Supremacy Clause, for the State to bring any criminal charges…
cited Cited "see" Lewis v. Commonwealth
Va. · 1973 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, State v. R.E.F., 251 So.2d 672 (Fla.App. 1971), aff’d, 265 So.2d 701 (Fla. 1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
R.E.F., a Juvenile, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
41542.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jul 26, 1972.
265 So. 2d 701
Per Curiam.
Published

Thomas A. Goldsmith, and Elliott & Tindell, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John W. Tanner, Asst. State's Atty., for appellee.

Michael S. Wald, for The National Council of Judges of the National Council on Crime and Delinquency, as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from the District Court of Appeal, First District.[*702] The decision sought to be reviewed[1] initially construes provisions of the Federal and Florida Constitutions relating to the concept of fundamental fairness in juvenile court proceedings, giving this Court jurisdiction under § 4 of Article V of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A.

After argument and upon careful consideration of the record and briefs, we conclude that the excellent opinion of the District Court correctly answers the questions involved. No additional explanation or decision by way of an opinion of this Court is needed.

Accordingly, the decision of the District Court of Appeal is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C.J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, DEKLE and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

1 State v. R.E.F., a Juvenile, 251 So.2d 672 (Fla.App.1st 1971).